CONTEXTUAL REALISM

Feminist Epistemology ‘Out of the Fly Bottle’?

Authors

  • George Karuvelil Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram (DVK)

Keywords:

Evidence, Feminist Epistemology, Objectivity, Situatedness, Quine, Wittgenstein

Abstract

Feminist epistemology, like other epistemologies that are built on the debris of modern epistemology, is strong in its critique of the infirmities of modern epistemology but weak in delivering objective knowledge. Since the heart of feminist epistemology is the situatedness of the knower, it needs to attain objectivity or universality of truth without compromising on diversity and subjectivity. Although the problem is not unique to the feminists, it is more pressing for them because unlike some shades of postmodernism that do away with all universal norms, feminists are committed to the Enlightenment ideals of justice, freedom, and emancipation, all of which call for objectivity and universality beyond one’s preferred group. Faced with this situation, the present paper outlines an epistemological position dubbed as contextual realism. As a form of realism, it makes room for objectivity and its contextualism for subjectivity and diversity.

Author Biography

George Karuvelil, Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram (DVK)

Dr George Karuvelil, Ordinary Professor of Philosophy and Religion and former Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy at Jnana-Deepa Vidyapeeth (JDV), Pune, is a Jesuit priest. He is the chief editor of Jnanadeepa: Pune Journal of Religious Studies and has published widely in national and international journals of philosophy and theology.

References

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, rev. 4th ed., Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 123.

Heidi Elizabeth Grasswick, Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge, Feminist Philosophy Collection, Dordrecht, New York: Springer, 2011, xix.

Helen Longino, "Feminist Epistemology," in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, eds., John Greco and Ernest Sosa, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1999, 327-28.

Marnia Lazreg, "Women's Experience and Feminist Epistemology: A Critical Neo-Rationalist Approach,” in Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology, eds., Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford, New York: Routledge, 1994, 58.

Anderson Elizabeth, "Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science", in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015), ed. Edward N. Zalta, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall 2015/ entries/feminism-epistemology/> (15.8.2016).

Wilson, Robert A. and Foglia, Lucia, "Embodied Cognition", in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016), ed. Edward N. Zalta, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/ embodied -cognition/> (15.8.2016).

Summa Theologica, I, Q.12. art.4.

Richard J. Bernstein, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism, Philadelphia: Univesity of Pennsylvania Press, 1983, 8.

Timm Triplett, "Recent Work on Foundationalism," American Philosophical Quarterly 27, no. 2 (1990), 93-116.

John D. Caputo, Philosophy and Theology: Horizons in Theology, Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2006, 65.

Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979, 315.

Merold Westphal, "Hermeneutics as Epistemology," in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, eds., Greco and Sosa, 415-35.

Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Routledge Classics, London: Routledge, 2002, xvi.

Tom Rockmore, On Constructivist Epistemology, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005, 24.

Richard H. Popkin, The Columbia History of Western Philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, 329-336.

Richard Swinburne, Epistemic Justification, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, 2; Robert Audi, Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, 3rd ed., Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy, New York: Routledge, 2011, 3 ff.

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, A viii, xii.

William P. Alston, Beyond "Justification": Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005, 36, 43; Jarrett Leplin, A Theory of Epistemic Justification, Philosophical Studies Series, Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, 19.

Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 6.

Helen Longino, The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001, 129.

Maurizio Ferraris, Manifesto of New Realism, Suny Series in Contemporary Italian Philosophy, Albany, New York: SUNY Press, 2014. 27See, Elke Brendel and Christoph Jäger, Contextualisms in Epistemology, Dordrecht; Norwell, MA: Springer, 2005.

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. David E. Linge, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976, 82.

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, London: Sheed & Ward, 1975.

Marie McGinn, Philosophical Investigations, Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks, London; New York: Routledge, 1997, 44.

Charles Guignon, "Philosophy after Wittgenstein and Heidegger," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, no. 4 (1990), 649-72.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty, trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe, New York: Harper, 1969, no. 105.

Hans-Johann Glock, "Relativism, Commensurability and Translatability," in Wittgenstein and Reason, ed., John Preston, Ratio Book Series, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, 25.

Philip Kitcher, "Real Realism: The Galilean Strategy," The Philosophical Review 110, no. 2 (2001), 151. This view is echoed by others. See, Anjan Chakravartty, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, xii.

Michael Devitt, Realism and Truth, 2nd ed., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997, 5, 14-22.

J. J. C. Smart and John Haldane, Atheism and Theism, 2nd ed., Great Debates in Philosophy, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, 4.

William P. Alston, "Realism and the Tasks of Epistemology," in Realism, Antirealism, and Epistemology, ed. Christopher B. Kulp, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1997, 54.

Alvin I. Goldman, Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986, 151-53.

Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, and Matthew H. Slater, eds., Carving Nature at Its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science, Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2011.

Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 49.

Arthur Eddigton, Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 1927 <http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Extras/ Eddington_Gifford.html> (12.3.2016).

Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996, 149.

George Karuvelil, "Epistemic Justification and the Possibility of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 12, no. 1 (1994), 29-48.

George Karuvelil, "To Whom Am I Speaking? Communication, Culture, and Fundamental Theology," Theological Studies 76, no. 4 (2015), 681.

Paul Ricœur, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976, 15.

W. V. Quine, "In Praise of Observation Sentences," The Journal of Philosophy 90, no. 3 (1993), 107-16.

Elizabeth Anderson, "Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science," The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015), ed., Edward N. Zalta, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/ entries/feminism-epistemology/> (20.8.2016).

Franz M. Wuketits, ed., Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1984, 80-84.

Johan Modée, "Observation Sentences and Joint Attention," Synthese 124, no. 2 (2000), 230.

Stuart Shanker, “Wittgenstein and Quine on the Nature of Language and Cognition and Its Implications for Constraint Theory” in Wittgenstein and Quine, eds., Robert L. Arrington and Hans-Johann Glock,London, New York: Routledge, 1996, 212-251.

Crispin Startwell, “Knowledge is Merely True Belief?” in American Philosophical Quarterly, 28. No.2 (April 1991), 157-165.

William P. Alston, Epistemic Justification, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1989, 7.

Earl B. Conee and Richard Feldman, Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology, Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2004, especially chapter 3; see also John Turri, "The Ontology of Epistemic Reasons," Nous 43, no. 3 (2009), 490-512.

Earl B. Conee and Richard Feldman, Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology, Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2004, especially chapter 3; see also John Turri, "The Ontology of Epistemic Reasons," Nous 43, no. 3 (2009), 490-512.

Philip Kitcher, "The Naturalists Return," The Philosophical Review 101, no. 1 (1992), 63.

Jaegwon Kim, Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy, New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1993. See in particular essays 8 “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept” and 12 “What Is Naturalized Epistemology?”.

Alvin Goldman, “What is Justified Belief?, in “George Sotiros Pappas, ed. Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy V. 17 Dordrecht; Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1979, 11.

William P. Alston, "Perceptual Knowledge," in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, ed. John Greco and Ernest Sosa, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1999, 232-33.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell, 1974, I: 23.

Ulric Neisser, Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1976.

W. V. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York; London: Columbia University Press, 1969, 11-13.

W.V. Quine, From Stimulus to Science, Cambride, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995, p. 21; W. V. Quine, "I, You, and It: An Epistemological Triangle," in Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine, ed. Alex Orenstein and Petr Kotatko, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht/Boson/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, 1, 2, 408.

H. P. Grice and Alan R. White, "Symposium: The Causal Theory of Perception "Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol 35 (1961), 121-168.

William P. Alston, The Reliability of Sense Perception, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1993.

William Child, Causality, Interpretation, and the Mind, Oxford Philosophical Monographs, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, 165.

William Fish, Philosophy of Perception: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy, London, New York: Routledge, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

Karuvelil, G. (2016). CONTEXTUAL REALISM: Feminist Epistemology ‘Out of the Fly Bottle’?. Journal of Dharma, 41(3), 249–272. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/393