THE PROCESS OF FORMULATING OFFICIAL CATHOLIC TEACHINGS
CONSULTING THE LAITY AND SENSUS FIDELIUM
Keywords:
Ecclesial Decision-Making, Laity, Lay Participation, Official Church Teaching, Sensus Fidelium, Sensus Fidei, Synod on the FamilyAbstract
Traditionally, Christian theology has upheld the fact that all the baptized are anointed by the Holy Spirit, and consequently, the Christian community as a whole will not be allowed to fall into error by the same Spirit, with regard to its faith and morals. Vatican II officially resurrected this traditional belief in and through the concept of sensus fidelium as expressed explicitly in LG, 12. However, during the post- Vatican II era what the concept implies with regard to the process of
official Church teaching, namely, to consult all the baptized (majority of whom are the laity) has not happened, resulting in a glaring gap between the teachings of the clerical hierarchy and the rest of the Church. The article, while insisting that majority or public opinion cannot be equated to sensus fidelium, nevertheless, points out the indispensable need to consult and listen to the laity if the Church’s teaching is to be credible in the eyes of the contemporary believers.
References
Pope Pius X, Vehementer (1906), 8.
Pope John Paul II, Christifideles Laici (1988), 9.
Ormond Rush, “Ecclesial Conversion After Vatican II: Renewing ‘The Face of the Church’ to Reflect ‘The Genuine Face of God,’” Theological Studies 74, 4
(December 2014) 799-802.
Francis A. Sullivan, Magisterium: The Teaching Authority in the Church, New York:
Paulist Press, 1983, 23.
“Sensus Fidei in the Life of the Church” (2014), 3.
Ormond Rush, The Eyes of Faith: The
Sense of the Faithful and the Church’s Reception of Revelation, Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2009, 215-219.
Anthony Ekpo, “The Sensus Fidelium and the Threefold Office of Christ: A
Reinterpretation of Lumen Gentium No.12,” Theological Studies 76, 2 (June 2015) 338- 339.
Yves Congar, The Meaning of Tradition, trans. A.N. Woodrow, San Francesco:
Ignatius Press, 2004 (Re-print), 79.
John Henry Newman, On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine, ed. John Coulson, London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1961, 75-101.
Avery Dulles, A Church to Believe In: Discipleship and the Dynamics of Freedom,
New York: Crossroad, 1982, 112.
Richard R. Gaillardetz and Catherine E. Clifford, Keys to the Council: Unlocking the
Teaching of Vatican II, Collegeville (Minnesota): Liturgical Presss, 2012, 42.
Austin Flannery, ed., Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, Vatican Collection Volume 1, Eighth Printing, New York: Costello Publishing House, 1987, 363.
John Mahoney, The Making of Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic
Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, 207.
Pope Francis and Father Spadaro, SJ, “Pope Francis’ Interview with Jesuit
Magazines,” Origins, 43, 19 (10 October 2013) 298-299.
Cfr. Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium (2013), 111-134. Henceforth, this will be
referred to as EG.
Thomas Knieps-Port Le Roi, “Lay Perspectives on Marriage and the Family: Introduction to the Colloquium,” INTAMS Review, 20, 2 (2014) 170.
Thomas Knieps-Port Le Roi, “Lay Perspectives on Marriage and the Family...,” 170.
Linda Woodhead, “What we Really Think,” The Tablet, 9 November 2013, 12.
Tina Beattie, “Let the Laity be Heard,” The Tablet, 16 August 2014, 9.
Ormond Rush, Eyes of Faith, 2.
Joseph Selling, “Is Lived Experience a Source of Morality?” INTAMS Review, 20,
(2014) 219.
