HOLISTIC ETHICS AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CRISES

Authors

  • Thomas Manickam St. John Vianney Seminary, Pretoria

Keywords:

global environmental crisis, religious ethos

Abstract

The global environmental crisis is fundamentally an ethical problem. It reflects also a crisis in human value system. In the contemporary global situation there are preferential value systems which people of various cultures and ethnic affiliations committed to ancient religious belief systems and practices stick to maintain. The latter component is generally called the religious ethos, although it is very much an integral part of an ethnic cultural milieu. Their religious belief systems also have to be seriously taken into account when we discuss finding ways and means to solve some of the human-made environmental crises on a global magnitude. The ethics of modem materialism seems to be a “worship of human pride.” Contemporary human communities world over value their own respective gains and take a certain degree of pride and glory of their own technological advancement even on their respective national banners and brand names. In this materialistic perspective of global achievements by certain world powers other things and humans are of value only in as much as they can be somehow used for achieving the targets of such global goal settings. Due to this overemphasis of reaching the competitive global marketing targets we need to acknowledge that our vicious materialistic interests of our ruthless advancement in productivity of industrial goods, we are making the Earth, our homeland and ourselves very sickly and neurotic. We need a new ethics that changes our role from being the controller and manipulator of the world to be its friend, servant and partner. In short, we need broaden our ethical vision and norms of application to solve the present day environmental crises from the confines of family and tribe to include nation, race and, finally, humankind. This is what is implied in applying holistic ethics and its integrative norms which take into account the specific religious ethos of various peoples and communities which constitute the so-called “Global Village” where everybody should know and respect each other’s ancestral belief systems, values and cultural identity traits which each community honours as its own great heritage. Can we solve our contemporary environmental problems following a set of universally acceptable holistic norms of ethical behaviour? This is the central question here under discussion to which I would like to contribute from my ecological awareness, reflections, and experience gained from my action programs. 

Author Biography

Thomas Manickam, St. John Vianney Seminary, Pretoria

Prof. Dr. Thomas Manickam CMI is a scholar in Comparative Religion and Comparative Philosophy with comparative critical study on the Law of Manu (Manus  ti) vis-à-vis Law of Moses (Tohra) and a Specialist in Ecology and Ecosophy. He holds a Ph. D in Comparative Philosophy from Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. He holds a post doctoral Research Diploma in Comparative Religion from the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) and another postDoctoral Research Diploma in Ecology from the Indian Institute of Ecology and Environmental Studies, New Delhi. Over a period of thirty years he taught Systematic Philosophy and Comparative Religion at Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram, Bangalore. His ecological interests have led him to take up an active personal crusade to reinstate respect for nature. At present, he teaches Ecosophy and Comparative Philosophy, while officiating as the head of the Dept. of Philosophy at St. John Vianney Seminary, Pretoria, South Africa.

References

Wilber, Up from Aden: A Transpersonal View of Human Evolution, London: Routledge & Kegen Paul, 1983, 13.

Freya Mathews, The Dancing of Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics, New York: Bantam Books, 1980, 281.

G. Bateson, Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, New York: Bantam Books, 1988, 99.

Frijof Capra, The Turning Point, New York: Bantam Books, 1982, 317.

Erich Jantisch, The Self-Organizing Universe, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1980, 308.

Erich Jantisch, Origins of the Sacred: The Ecstasies of Love and War, London: Abacus, 1993, xxiv.

George Wald, “Life and Mind in the Universe,” Paper Presented in the Seminar of NCERT, New Delhi, February 1987.

Michael Talbot, Mysticism and New Physics, cited in Jitatmananda in Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo, Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1993, 2:65.

Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, Essex: Lingman Scientific and Technical, 1986, 5.

S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe, London: Harper Collins, 1993, 149.

David Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1959, 143.

Paul Davies, Superforce: The Search for a Grand Unified Theory of Nature, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1985, 222.

Paul Chauchard, Man and Cosmos: Scientific Phenomenology in Teilhard de Chardin, New York: Herder & Herder, 1965, 192.

Teilhard de Chardin, Building the Earth, trans. Noel Linndsay, Wilkes Barre: Dimension Books, 1965, 67, 727.

Barry Lang, The Origins of Man and the Universe: The Myth that Came to Life, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984, 226.

Sri Aurobindo, The Life Divine, Pondicherry: Aurobindo Ashram, 1969, 974.

Barry Lang, Origin of Man and the Universe, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984, 153-154.

Carolyn Merchant, Earth Care: Women and the Environment, New York: Routledge, 1995, 76.

Gary Snyder, Practice of the Wild, New York: North Point Press, 1997, 29.

Thomas Berry, The Dream of the Earth, San Francisco: Siera Club Books, 1998, 17.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-30

How to Cite

Manickam, T. (2008). HOLISTIC ETHICS AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CRISES. Journal of Dharma, 33(2), 111–132. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/410