THE HERMENEUTIC OF SUSPICION AND RELIGION

Authors

  • Purushottama Bilimoria Deakin University

Keywords:

Hermeneutics, Religion, Heidegger, Gadamer, Habermas's attack, Paul Ricoeur, Suspicion

Abstract

In this paper I wish to examine a contemporary response to an important debate in the "science" of hermeneutics-- "the art of rightly understanding the speech, chiefly in written form, of another" (Schleiermacher, 1977). The 20th century has witnessed what has been termed "a profound radicalisation of the understanding of texts" inasmuch as hermeneutics--the programmatic of interpretation and all that it had hitherto supposed about the nature and relation of text and its meaning--is itself problematised. The site of the contestation has been language, understood in the broadest possible sense of the medium that functions to convey meaning, textual and otherwise.

Author Biography

Purushottama Bilimoria, Deakin University

Purushottama Bilimoria is Senior, Lecturer in Philosophy at Deakin University in Melbourne, Australia,

References

Bernstein. Richard (1982) "What is the Difference that Makes a Difference=Gadarncr. Habcrmas, and Rorty", reprinted in Wachterhauser (1986 ed. q.v.) pp. 343-376.

Bilimoria, Purushottarna (1988), Sabdapramana: World and Knowledge A Doctrine in Nyaya-Mimamsa Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

(1993)"The Enigma of Modernism in Early Twentieth Century Indian Art: Schools of Oriental Art," in John Clark (ed.) Modernity in Asian Art, University of Sydney East Asian Studies Number 7, Sydney/lHonolulu: Wild Peony with University of Hawaii Press, pp. 29-44.

(1996a),"Paritranaya sadhunam--What might tradition's response be to BJP's Hindu Rashtra?" in John McGuire, Peter Reeves and Howard Brasted (eds). Politics of Violence From Ayodhya to Behrampada, Studies on Contemporary South Asia No 1. New Delhi London: Sage Publications. pp 159-178.

(1996b)," ASubaltern /Postcolonial Critique of Philosophy of Religion in the Indian context", paper presented in Philosophy of Religion Panel, American Academy of Religion, November 23-26, New Orleans, USA.

(l997a) "On SankaraS Atten-ped RecariliaIioo of "You" and "I" 'T': Yusmadasmatsamanvaya", in P Bilimoria & J N Mohanty (eds), Relativism, Suffering and Beyond Essays in Memory of Bimal K Matilal. Delhi New York/Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 252-278.

(1997b), "The Debate surrounding Personal Law and its Constitutional Status in the aftermath of the Shah Bano Judgment", forthcoming in Journal of Dharma.

Cahoone, Lawrence E. (ed.) (1996) From Modernism to Postmodemism An Anthology. Oxford/Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Caputo, John D. (1989). "Gadamer"s Closet Essentialism: A Derridean Critique", in Diane P Michelfelder & Richard E. Palmer (eds), D & D (q.v.) pp. 258-264.

(1975)Truth and Method. (English translation of W M), (London: SheedandWard; NewYork: SeaburyPress).

Hegel, G W F.(1985), Introduction to the Lectures on the History of philosophy (trans by T M Knox and A V Miller),(Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Jackson, William (ed.) (1992) J L Mehta on Heidegger, Hermeneutics and Indian Tradition. (Leiden: Brill).

Magliola, Robert (1997), On Deconstructing Life worlds-Buddhism, Christianity, Culture (Atlanta: Scholars Press).

McCarthy, Thomas(1982 )Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge M A: MITPress), esp. pp 57-78.

Schleiermacher, F. (1977) Hermeneutik und Kritik (ed. by M Frank) (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

Spivak, Gayatri Chakraborty (1988) "Can the Subaltern Speak?", in Cary Nelson & Lawrence Grossberg (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (London: Macmillan Education) pp. 271-313.

Wachterhauser, Brice R. (ed.) (1986) Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. (Albany: State University of New York Press).

Downloads

Published

1997-09-30

How to Cite

Bilimoria, P. (1997). THE HERMENEUTIC OF SUSPICION AND RELIGION. Journal of Dharma, 22(3), 247–274. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/1124