THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PRACTICES OF COMPARATIVE THEOLOGIANS
Keywords:
COMPARATIVE THEOLOGIANS, EPISTEMOLOGYAbstract
In this article, I will mainly expose and assess comparative theological views on comparison as an epistemological norm. More specifically, in what follows, taking cues from a comparative educationist, George Z.F. Bereday, and a contemporary theorist of interreligious learning, J.A. Berling, I will first set up a heuristic apparatus to analyze the process of comparative learning; and then, in the four subsections that immediately follow, I will gradually expose the different, interconnected epistemic procedures of comparative theologians, especially, those of Francis X. Clooney.
References
Francis X. Clooney, Comparative Theology: Deep Learning across Religious Borders, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
George Z.F. Bereday, Comparative Method in Education, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.
David Tracy, “Theology: Comparative Theology,” in Encylopedia of Religion, 2nd Edition, ed. Lindsay Jones, Farmington Hills, MI: Cergage Gale, 2005.
J. A Berling, “The Process of Interreligious Learning,” in Interreligious Learning, ed. D. Pollefeyt, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2007.
Catherine Cornille, The Im-possibility of Interreligious Dialogue, New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 2008.
Russell T. McCutcheon, ed. The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader, London: Cassell, 1999.
Francis X. Clooney, “Vedānta, Commentary, and the Theological Component of Cross-Cultural Study,” in Frank Reynolds and David Tracy, ed., Myth and Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
Francis X. Clooney, The Truth, The Way, The Life: Christian Commentary on the Three Holy Mantras of the Śrīvaișņava Hindus, Leuven: Peeters, 2008.
John Perry, Reference and Reflexivity, Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2001.
Isidora Stojanovic, “Two Problems of Overgeneration for the Reflexive-Referential Theory,” available from http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/28/36/97/PDF/two_problems_for_RRT.p df,
Isidora Stojanovic, “What Is Said, Linguistic Meaning, and Directly Referential Expressions,” Philosophy Compass 1, 10 (2006).
Michael Morreau, “It Simply Does Not Add Up: Trouble with Overall Similarity,” in The Journal of Philosophy, CVII, 9 (September 2010),
Joseph Kaipayil, The Epistemology of Comparative Philosophy: A Critique with Reference to P.T. Raju’s Views, Rome: Centre for Indian and Inter-Religious Studies, 1995.
Hugh Nicholson, “The New Comparative Theology and the Problem of Theological Hegemonism” in Francis X. Clooney, ed. The New Comparative Theology: Interreligious Insights from the Next Generation, New York: T&T Clark, 2010.
Francis X. Clooney, “The Principle of Upasam ̇ hāra and the Development of Vedanta as an Uttara Mīmām ̇ sā” in Mandana Miśra and R. C. Dwivedi, ed., Studies in Mīmām ̇ sā: Dr. Mandan Mishra Felicitation Volume, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1994.
Francis X. Clooney, Theology after Vedanta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology, New York: State University of New York Press, 1993.
David B. Zilberman, Analogy in Indian and Western Philosophical Thought, ed., Helena Gourko and Robert S. Cohen, New York: Springer, 2006.
Paul Ricoeur, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen Mclaughin and John Costello, London: Routledge, 1978.
Paul Ricoeur, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, 1976;
David Tracy, The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism, New York: Crossroad, 1981.
Shiv Kumar, Upamāna in Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers, 1980.
Guy Swanson, “Frameworks for Comparative Research: Structural Anthropology and the Theory of Action,” in Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications, ed. Ivan Vallier, 141-202, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.
Charles C. Ragin, Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
Stephen Bevans, “Variations on a Theme by Anselm: Contemporary Reflections on a Classic Definition,” in Toronto Journal of Theology, 21, 1 (2005).
Anselm of Canterbury, Prosologion, edited and translated by Jasper Hopkins and Herbert Richardson, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1974.
Henri Cardinal de Lucac, SJ, Corpus Mysticum: The Eucharist and the Church in the Middle Ages, trans. Gemma Simmonds, C.J. with Richard Price and Christopher Stephens, ed., Laurence Paul Hemming and Susan Frank Parsons, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Joseph-Marie Verlinde, De Verboden Ervaring: Van de Ashram narr het Klooster: Relaas van een Zoektocht naar God, Tielt: Lannoo, 2004.
De Lucac, SJ, Corpus Mysticum, 237. See also Jasper Hopkins, Hermeneutical and Textual Problems in the Complete Treatises of St. Anselm, Anselm of Canterbury, vol. 4, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1976.
