SHOULD RELIGION HAVE A PUBLIC ROLE?
Theologizing from the Filipino Context
Keywords:
RELIGION, FilipinoAbstract
Should religion have a public role? Should it be engaged in the public arena? Or should religion be kept a private affair? Addressing this question, this article is developed in three parts: first, the meaning of religion; second, the debate on the public role of religion; and third, theologizing from the Filipino context. This question is pursued in the face of the growing secularization in the world which marginalizes religion, and decimates its value as a social reality. Those who argue against the public role of religion privatizes it, or reduces its reach of influence only to its adherents. This article presents the varied positions in the debate on the public role of religion, and validates religion as a force of change and transformation in the Filipino context.
References
Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Paul Tillich, Dynamics of Faith, New York: Harper & Row, 1958.
Bernard J.F. Lonergan, Method in Theology, New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.
Rudolf Otto, The Idea of theHoly, London: Oxford, 1923.
Karl Rahner, The Dynamic Element in the Church, Montreal: Palm, 1964.
Karl Rahner, Foundations of Christian Faith, trans. William V. Dych, New York: Crossroad, 1995.
Karl Rahner’s View of Mysticism,” Toronto Journal of Theology 17 (2001).
Andrew Tallon, “The Heart in Rahner’s Philosophy of Mysticism,” Theological Studies 53 (1992).
Clifford Geertz, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, ed., Michael Banton, London: Tavistock, 1966.
Clifford Geertz, Myth, Symbol, and Culture, New York: Norton, 1974;
Clifford Geertz, “Impact of the Concept of Culture in the Concept of Man,” The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic, 1973.
Clifford Geertz, “The Growth of Culture and the Evolution of the Mind,” in Theories of the Mind, ed., Jordan M. Scher, New York: Free Press, 1966.
Clifford Geertz, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, New York: Anchor, 1969
Clifford Geertz, A Rumor of Angels: Modern Society and Rediscovery of the Sacred, New York: Anchor, 1970.
John H. Morgan, ed., Understanding Religion and Culture: Anthropological and Theological Perspectives, Washington: University Press of America, 1979.
Abraham Heschel, Who is Man, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1958.
Robley Edward Whitson, The Coming Convergence of World Religions, New York: New Press, 1971.
James Luther Adams, introduction to Paul Tillich, What is Religion? New York: Harper &Row,1969.
Richard J. Beauchesne, “The Spiritual Existential as Desire: Karl Rahner and Emmanuel Levinas, Église et théologie 23 (1992).
Karl Rahner, Hearer of the Word: Laying the Foundation for a Philosophy of Religion, trans. Joseph Donceel, ed., Andrew Tallon, New York: Continuum, 1994.
David Tracy, Concilium: Religion in the Eighties 136, New York: Seabury, 1980.
Paul Knitter, Christianity as a Religion: True and Absolute? A Roman Catholic Perspective,” in What is Religion? An Enquiry for Christian Theology, ed., Mircea Eliade.
David Hollenbach, “Religion and Political Life,” Theological Studies 57 (1991)
Martha Nussbaum, “Aristotelian Social Democracy,” in Liberalism and the Good, ed., Bruce Douglass, Gerald M. Mara and Henry S. Richardson, New York & London: Routledge, 1990.
Michael J. Perry, Morality,Politics, and Law: A Bicentennial Essay, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Pedro S. de Achútegui, “Presentation” in “The ‘Miracle’ of the Philippine Revolution: Interdisciplinary Reflections,” a symposium organized by the Loyola School of Theology, ed. Pedro S. Achútegui, Loyola Papers 15 (1986).
David Hollenbach, The Common Good and Christian Ethics, New York: Cambridge University, 2002.
Patricia R. Mamot, Profile of Filipino Heroism, Quezon City: New Day, 1986.
