IN A DIFFERENT VIEW

FEMINIST CONTRIBUTION TO ECUMENICAL DIALOGUE

Authors

  • Delfo C Canceran University of Santo Tomas, Manila

Keywords:

Dialogue, Diversity, Ecclesiology, Ecumenism, Feminism, Hermeneutics of Differences, Reflective Solidarity, Unity, World Council of Churches

Abstract

In ecumenical dialogue, we are witnessing a blurring of distinctions or crossing of boundaries. Ecumenical dialogue relates with the complex narratives of community life of the different churches in the world. This paper deals with the problematic of ecumenical dialogue by deriving ideas from feminist theories. Feminist theories have explored and proposed ideas on identity which we can use in ecumenical dialogue as a guidepost in relating with other churches or faiths. The discourse on identity is useful in positioning oneself in a dialogue that respects the difference or particularity of each church of faith. Churches should always recognize the limits of their reason and welcome self-critique in their knowledge. Reflective solidarity can be proposed as an appropriate way of dealing with the tension posed by ecumenical dialogue. Reflective solidarity is defined as a mutual expectation of the churches’ responsible orientation to ecumenical movement. In line with hermeneutics of difference, reflective solidarity builds from ties created by difference.

Author Biography

Delfo C Canceran, University of Santo Tomas, Manila

Delfo C. Canceran is a member of the Dominican Province of the Philippines. He teaches theology and development studies at the University of Santo Tomas and theology at the Maryhill School of Theology in the Philippines. He is presently assigned at the House of San Lorenzo Ruiz in Navotas City within the Diocese of Caloocan. Email: delfocanceran@yahoo.com

References

Sara Ahmed, Differences that Matter: Feminist Theory and Postmodernism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Peter Huising & Knunt Wale, ed., “The Ecumenical Council – Its Significance in the Constitution of the Church,” Religion in the Eighties, in Concilium, no. 2 (1983).

Wesley Ariarajah, “Ecumenical Impact of Inter-religious Dialogue,” The Ecumenical Review 49, 2 (1997).

Kuncheria Pathil, Models in Ecumenical Dialogue, Banglaore: Dharmaram Publications, 1981.

Thomas Hughson, “Common Understanding of Ecumenism: A Present Need,” The Ecumenical Review 46, 3 (1993).

Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, London: Verso, 199.

Mary Rose D’Angelo, “‘Abba’ and ‘Father’: Imperial Theology and the Jesus Traditions,” Journal of Biblical Literature, 3, 4 (1992).

Elizabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, Jesus, Miriam’s Child, Sophia’s Prophet, Critical Issues in Feminist Christology, New York: Continuum, 1999.

Allan Black, “Ironies of Ecumenism,” The Ecumenical Review 45, 4 (1993).

Alan Falconer, ed., “Towards a Hermeneutics for a Growing Koinonia, Appendix 2,” in Faith and Order in Moshi, the 1996 Commission Meeting, Faith and Order Paper no. 177, Geneva: WCC Publications, 1998.

J.B. Banawiratma, “A Vision of Ecumenical Unity and Mission,” Voices from the Third World XX, 1 (June 1997).

Helen Longino, Feminist Epistemology, John Greco and Ernest Sosa, ed., Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.

Konrad Raiser, “Hermeneutics of Unity,” in Faith and Order in Moshi, the 1996 Commission Meeting, Faith and Order Paper no. 177, Alan Falconer, ed., Geneva: WCC Publications, 1998.

Reinhard Groscurth, “Conversion and Identity, The United Churches: Origins, Progress, Relationships,” The Ecumenical Review 47, 4 (1995).

Anna Marie Aagaard, “Pluralism, Ambiguity and Dialogue,” in The Living Tradition, Towards an Ecumenical Hermeneutics of the Christian Tradition, Anton Houtepen, ed., Utrecht: Interuniversitair Instituut voor Missiologie en Oecumenica, 1995.

Marlin Van Elderen, “Towards a Common Understanding and Vision,” The Ecumenical Review 43, 1 (1991).

Melanie May, “Ecumenical Hermeneutics: Working Principles Pondered,” in Faith and Order in Moshi, the 1996 Commission Meeting, Faith and Order Paper no. 177, Alan Falconer, ed., Geneva: WCC Publications, 1998.

Ans Van Der Bent, “A Renewed Ecumenical Movement,” The Ecumenical Review 43, 2 (1991).

Janet Crawford, “Pilgrimage: Towards an Ecumenical Understanding,” The Ecumenical Review 45, 2 (1993).

Alan Black, “Ironies of Ecumenism,” The Ecumenical Review 45, 4 (1993).

Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and Ambivalence, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991; Postmodernity and its Discontent, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.

Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, London: Free Association Books, 1991.

Kathy Ferguson, The Woman Question, Feminist Theory, Vision of Subjectivity, Berkley: University of California Press, 1993.

Dale Irvin, “Towards a Hermeneutics of Difference at the Crossroad of Ecumenics,” The Ecumenical Review 47, 4 (1995).

Francois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition, Report on Knowledge, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

Judith Butler, “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism,’” in Feminists Theorize the Political,” Judith Butler & Joan W. Scott, ed., New York: Routledge, 1992.

Kyung Sook Lee, “Ecumenical Hermeneutics: An Asian Response,” in Faith and Order in Moshi, the 1996 Commission Meeting, Faith and Order Paper no. 177, Alan Falconer, ed., Geneva: WCC Publications, 1998.

Dale Irvin, “The Banquet of Ecumenism,” The Ecumenical Review 43, 1 (1991).

Aram Keshishian, “Towards a Self-Understanding of the WCC,” The Ecumenical Review 43, 1 (1991).

Jacques Derrida, “Faith and Knowledge: The Two Sources of Religion at the Limits of Reason Alone,” in Religion, Jacques Derrida & Gianni Vattino, ed., Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.

Aukje Westra, “Ecumenical Hermeneutics: Criteria for Truth and Justice,” in The Living Tradition: Towards an Ecumenical Hermeneutics of the Christian Tradition, Anton Houtepen, ed., Utretch: Interuniversitair Instituut voor Missiologie en Oecumenia, 1995.

I. Aram, “The Ecumenical Movement at a Crossroad,” The Ecumenical Review 47, 4 (1995).

Judi Dean, Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics, Berkley: University of California Press, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-31

How to Cite

Canceran, D. C. (2019). IN A DIFFERENT VIEW: FEMINIST CONTRIBUTION TO ECUMENICAL DIALOGUE. Asian Horizons, 13(01), 99–114. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/ah/article/view/2175

Most read articles by the same author(s)