THE FILIPINO FAMILY – LIGHTS AND SHADOWS

Challenges to the Domestic Church

Authors

  • Levy Lara Lanaria University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines

Keywords:

FILIPINO FAMILY, LIGHTS AND SHADOWS, Domestic Church

Abstract

Vatican II’s retrieval of the notion of family as domestic church in
its landmark document Lumen Gentium (n. 11) has provided impetus
to the production of magisterial and theological reflections on the
ecclesiological motif the last several decades. In the Philippines such
titles attached to the Christian family as “the basic unit of Christian
life,” “subject and object of evangelization,” “the primary community
of Christ’s disciples,” “the church of the home,” or “the church in the
home,” and “agent of renewal” have found their way in pastoral and
theological discourse

Author Biography

Levy Lara Lanaria, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines

Dr Levy Lara Lanaria is a Filipino family man and Associate Professor of the
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of San Carlos, Cebu
City, Philippines. He finished his M.A. in Religious Education at the University of
San Carlos in 1993 and Ph.D. in Applied Theology at the De La Salle University,
Manila in 2008. His last published article was “The CBCP Statement on the
Reproductive Health Bill: A Looking Back and Postscript,” East Asian Pastoral Review
50, no. 1 (2013). Email: levria@yahoo.com

References

Jose M. de Mesa, “Re-rooting Mission in the Family,” Mission Studies 19/1-37

(2002).

F. Landa Jocano, Filipino Social Organization: Traditional Kinship and Family

Organization. Anthropology of the Filipino People III, Metro Manila: PUNLAD Research

House, 1998.

Niels Mulder, “Filipino Culture and Social Analysis,” Philippines Studies 42 (1994).

Jaime C. Bulatao, “The

Manileño’s Mainsprings” in Four Readings on Philippine Values, ed., Frank X. Lynch

and Alfonso de Guzman II, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1972.

F. Landa Jocano, Filipino Worldwide: Ethnography of Local Knowledge, Metro Manila:

PUNLAD Research House, Inc., 2001.

Jocano, Filipino Social Organization: Traditional Kinship and Family Organization,

Social Organization in Three Philippine Villages: An Exploration in

Rural Anthropology, Manila: CEU Research and Development Center, 1988.

Michael L. Tan, “Coming Home, Going Home,” Sunday Inquirer Magazine (23

November 2008).

Estela P. Padilla, “BEC Spirituality,” in BECs in the Philippines: Dream or Reality A

Multi-Disciplinary Reflection, Taytay, Rizal: Bukal ng Tipan, 2004.

F. Landa Jocano, The Hiligaynon: An Ethnography of Family and Community Life in

Western Bisayas Region, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Asian Center,

Pax Policarpio Mendez and F. Landa Jocano, The Filipino Family in Its Rural and

Urban Orientation: Two Case Studies, Manila: Research and Development Center,

Centro Escolar University, 1974.

Gelia T. Castillo, Where Food and Population Meet: The Filipino Household among

Other Households, UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies in cooperation

with the University of the Philippines Press, 1993.

Gelia T. Castillo, Where Food and Population Meet, 7. In another study Castillo puts

forward the sociological importance of the household (Gelia T. Castillo, Beyond

Manila: Philippine Rural Problems in Perspective, Ottawa, Canada: International

Development Research Centre, 1979.

Robert B. Fox, “Prehistoric Foundations of Contemporary Filipino Culture and

Society,” in Readings on Philippine Culture and Social Life, ed., Amparo S. Lardizabal

and Felicitas Tansuan-Leogardo, Manila: Rex Book Store, 1990, 31-62; Alfred W.

McCoy, “An Anarchy of Families: The Historiography of State and Family in the

Philippines,” in An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines, ed., McCoy,

Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press, 1994.

Maruja M.B. Asis, “Family Ties in a World without Borders,” Philippine

Sociological Review 42, 1-4 (2004) 16; Virginia A. Miralao, “The Family, Traditional

Values and the Socio-Cultural Transformation of Philippine Society,” Philippine

Sociological Review 45, 1-4 (1997).

Jose M. de Mesa, “Attending to the Cultural in Contemporary Theologizing,” in

Liberation Theologies in Shifting Grounds, ed., George de Schriver, Uitgeverij Peeters,

Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1998.

Virgilio Enriquez, From Colonial to Liberation Theology: The Philippine Experience,

Manila: De La Salle University Press, 1994.

Adelamar N. Alcantara, “Gender Roles, Fertility,

and the Status of Married Filipino Men and Women,” Philippine Sociological Review 42,

-4 (January-December 1994).

Anna Mirren

Gonzales and Mary Hollnsteiner, “Filipino Women as Partners of Men in Progress

and Development: A Survey of Empirical Data and a Statement of Basic Goals

Fostering Male-Female Partnership” (Research Report), Quezon City: Institute of

Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University, 1976.

Jeane Frances Illo,

“Involvement by Choice: The Role of Women in Development” (final report

submitted to USAID, Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University,

.

Mendez and F. Landa Jocano, The Filipino Family in its Rural and Urban

Orientation: Two Case Studies, Manila: Research and Development Center, Centro

Escolar University, 1974.

W. Liu and E. Yu. “The Lower Class Cebuano Family: A

Preliminary Analysis,” Philippine Sociological Review 6, (1968)

Adelamar N. Alcantara, “Gender Roles, Fertility, and the Status of Married Filipino

Men and Women,” Philippine Sociological Review 42, 1-4 (January-December 1994) 101. Cf.

Judy Carol C. Sevilla, “The Filipino Woman and the Family,” in The Filipino Woman in Focus:

A Book of Readings, ed., Amaryllis T. Torres, Quezon City: ORC-UP Press, 1995.

Adelamar N. Alcantara, “Gender Roles, Fertility and the Status of Married

Filipino Men and Women,” Philippine Sociological Review 42, 1-4 (January-December,

.

Joseph Vancio, “The Realities of Marriage of Urban Filipino Women,” Philippine

Studies 28 (1980).

Elmira Judy T. Aguilar, “Rethinking Pagkalalaki among Married Cebuanos

Choosing Non-Scalpel Vasectomy” (Ph.D. diss., University of San Carlos, Cebu City,

March 2006).

Pablito A. Baybado, Jr., “The Religious Socialization of Selected Families in

Diffun, Quirino Province, and Santiago City: A Descriptive-Analytical Study,” in The

Filipino Family Survey 2003 Globalization and the Asian Family, Social Science Research

Center, University of Santo Tomas, 2003.

Pablito A. Baybado, Jr., “The Religious Socialization of Selected Families in

Diffun, Quirino Province and Santiago City: A Descriptive-Analytical Survey,” in The

Filipino Family Survey 2003 Globalization and the Asian Family, Social Science Research

Center, University of Santo Tomas, 2003.

Adelaida V. Mayo, “The Parents’ Bedroom: A Reflection of the Closeness of

Lower-, Middle- and Upper-Income Filipino Families,” in Studies on Filipino Familism

Vol. 1, ed. Cecilia A. Florencio and Flor Crisanta F. Galvez, Quezon City: University

of the Philippines Family Studies Program, 1995.

F. Landa Jocano, “Filipino Family Values,” in The Filipino Family: A Spectrum of

Views and Issues with Foreword by Corazon Juliano Agrava, ed., Aurora E. Perez,

Quezon City: UP Office of Research and Coordination, 1995.

Jose M. de Mesa, In Solidarity with the Culture: Studies in Theological Re-rooting,

Maryhill Studies 4, Quezon City: Maryhill School of Theology, 1991.

Mina Ramirez, “The Paradox of the Filipino Family: A Phenomenological

Approach,” in Towards Building the Filipino Today, ed., Felicidad M. Dacayanan and

Josefina Dy R. Isaac, Social Awareness no. 1, Asian Social Institute, 1974.

Leticia Ramos Shahani, Moral Imperatives of National Renewal: Readings on the

Moral Recovery Program, Manila: Senate, 1993.

Mina M. Ramirez, Understanding Philippine Social Realities through the Filipino

Family: A Phenomenological Approach, Malate, Manila: Asian Social Institute, 1984.

McCoy, ed., An Anarchy of Families; also Maria Cynthia Rose Banzon

Bautista, foreword to Landlords and Capitalists: Class, Family, and State in Philippine

Manufacturing by Temario C. Rivera (Center for Integrative and Development Studies

University of the Philippines Press in cooperation with the Philippine Center for

Policy Studies, 1994).

Tony Begornia, “Congress Won’t End Reign of Political Dynasties,”

Philippine Daily Inquirer (April 26, 2010).

Ruben M. Tanseco, “The Role of the Family in the Struggle for Justice and

Peace,” in The Family for Justice, Makati: Salesiana Publishers, 1985.

Sr. Mary John Mananzan, ed., Essays on Women, rev. ed.,

Women’s Study Series 1, Manila: The Institute of Women’s Studies, St Scholastica’s

College, 1989.69Women’s oppression or sexism is considered by the feminists as a universal

system which is embedded in various cultures and socio-economic levels. For them it

is as much an issue in the Second and Third World as in the First World countries

(Rosemary Radford Ruether, “A Feminist Perspective,” in Doing Theology in a Divided

World, ed., Virginia Fabella and Sergio Torres, Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books,

Aguilar, Filipino Housewives Speak, 157; also George M. Guthrie, The Psychology of

Modernization in the Rural Philippines, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University

Press, 1971.

Aguilar, Filipino Housewives Speak, 165. Carolyn Israel-Sobritchea calls this the

“ideology of female nature” which privileges female reproductive role at the expense

of the woman’s right to decide (Israel-Sobritchea, “Gender Inequality and Its

Supporting Ideologies,” in And She Said No! Human Rights, Women’s Identities and

Struggles, ed., Liberato Bautista and Elizabeth Rifareal, Quezon City: National

Council of Churches in the Philippines, Program Unit on Human Rights, 1990.

UP Centre of Women’s Studies Foundation, “The Many Faces of Violence:

Abusers and Abusive Relationships in Filipino Families” (An Abridged Report.

.

Christine Crisol, “Gender and Social Transformation,” Philippine Sociological

Review 49, 1-2 (2001).

S.H. Guerrero, “Decisión-Making Among Farm Families in a

Philippine Barrio,” (M.S. thesis, College of Agriculture, University of the Philippines,

.

Robert Fox, “Filipino Family and Kinship,” in Philippine

Quarterly 2, 1 (1961).

Emma Porio, Frank Lynch and Mary R. Hollnsteiner, “The Filipino Family,

Community and Nation: The Same Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow?,” Ateneo de

Manila University Institute of Philippine Culture, 1975.

Gelia T. Castillo, The Filipino

Woman as Manpower: The Image and the Empirical Reality, University of the Philippines

at Los Baños College, Laguna, 1976.

Mary Lou Alcid, “Women and Their Status,” Philippine Population

Literature (1984).

Joseph C. Atkinson, “Family as Domestic Church: Developmental Trajectory,

Legitimacy, and Problems of Appropriation,” Theological Studies 66, 3 (September

.

Diarmuid O’Murchu, Christianity’s Dangerous Memory: A Rediscovery of the

Revolutionary Jesus, Quezon City: Claretian Publications, 2012.

Albert Nolan, Jesus Before Christianity, Quezon City: Claretian Publications, 1999.

Julie Janlon Rubio, A Christian Theology of Marriage and Family, New

York/Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 2003.

Richard Bauckham, Gospel Women: Studies of the Named

Women in the Gospels, Grand Rapids, Michigan/Cambridge, U.K.: William B.

Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002.

Ekkehard W. Stegemann and Wolfgang

Stegemann, The Jesus Movement: A Social History of Its First Centruy, trans. O.C. Dean,

Jr., Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

Evelyn and Frank Stagg, Woman in the

World of Jesus, Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1978.

Lisa Sowle Cahill, Family: A Christian Social Perspective, Minneapolis: Fortress

Press, 2000,

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

How to Cite

Lanaria, L. L. (2013). THE FILIPINO FAMILY – LIGHTS AND SHADOWS: Challenges to the Domestic Church. Asian Horizons, 7(02), 237–260. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/ah/article/view/2056