The INSTITUTION OF THE FAMILY AND THE VIRTUOUS SOCIETY

  • David Lutz Holy Cross College
Keywords: Common Good, Community, Family, Liberalism, Marriage, Social Institution, Virtue

Abstract

Ethical societies are composed of virtuous communities, supported by the social whole according to the principle of subsidiarity, and virtuous persons, ruled by just laws. The most important community in any society is the family; the foundation of the family is marriage. In traditional societies, although the institution of the family takes on various forms, it has ethical obligations and promotes the common good of society. Within liberal societies, marriage is transformed into a relationship between contracting individuals, who are free to choose the rules for their marriages. Because the liberal model of marriage is based on emotions, which frequently change, marriages are less stable and their ability to promote the good of society is diminished. Therefore, we should safeguard or recover the understanding and reality of the family as a social institution with ethical obligations. Members of liberal societies are not obligated to accept the liberal redefinition of marriage. Catholics can understand the cultivation of ethical societies as one way of responding to the universal call to holiness.

References

Adams, John. “To the Officers of the Militia of Massachusetts.” 11 October 1798. 31 July 2020.

Bell, Duran. “Defining Marriage and Legitimacy.” Current Anthropology 38.2 (1997): 237-253.

Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M, Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.

Brake, Elizabeth. “Minimal Marriage: What Political Liberalism Implies for Marriage Law.” Ethics 120.2 (2010): 302-337.

Courts of Probate and Divorce. Hyde v. Hyde and Woodmansee. 20 March 1866, 3 July 2020.

Deneen, Patrick J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Fineman, Martha Albertson. “The Meaning of Marriage.” Marriage Proposals: Questioning a Legal Status. Ed. Anita Bernstein. New York: NYU Press, 2006. 29-69.

Forsyth, Andrew. “Defining Marriage.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 97.3 (2014): 297-322.

Freeman, Elizabeth. “Marriage.” Keywords for American Cultural Studies. 2nd Edition. Ed. Bruce Burgett and Glenn Hendler. New York: NYU Press, 2014. 162-164.

Friedman, Milton. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970. 31 July 2020.

George, Robert P., Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson. “Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal.” Hollingsworth v. Perry. 133 Supreme Court 2652 (29 January 2013) 3 July 2020.

Girgis, Sherif, Robert P. George, and Ryan T. Anderson. “What Is Marriage?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 34.1 (2010): 245-287.

Gough, E. Kathleen. “The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 89.1 (1959): 23-34.

Gupta, Bina. “‘Bhagavad Gītā’ as Duty and Virtue Ethics: Some Reflections.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 34.3 (2006): 373-395.

Hart-Brinson, Peter. The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture. New York: NYU Press, 2018.

Hittinger, Russell. “Love, Sustainability, and Solidarity: Philosophical and Theological Roots.” Free Markets with Sustainability and Solidarity. Ed. Martin Schlag and Juan A. Mercado. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2016. 19-31.

Leach, Edmund R. “Polyandry, Inheritance and the Definition of Marriage.” Man 199 (1955): 182-186.

Marx, Karl. “Theses on Feuerbach.” Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Vol. 5. New York: International Publishers, 1976. 6-8.

Nussbaum, Martha C. “A Right to Marry?” California Law Review 98.3 (2010): 667-696.

Poulter, Sebastian. “The Definition of Marriage in English Law.” The Modern Law Review 42.4 (1979): 409-429.

Pruthi, Sandhya. “The Notion of Self and Ethics in Śaṅkara’s Philosophy.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 96 (2015): 94-99.

Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Notes and Queries on Anthropology. 6th Ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1951.

Rubio, Julie Hanlon. Family Ethics: Practices for Christians Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2010.

Wilcox, W. Bradford. “For as Long as Our Love Shall Last: How the Soulmate Myth Makes Marriage Less Stable and Less Happy.” Institute for Family Studies. 20 May 2020. 31 July 2020.

Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Steven L. Nock. “‘Her’ Marriage after the Revolutions.” Sociological Forum 22.1 (2007): 103-110.

Wilcox, W. Bradford, Nicholas H. Wolfinger, and Charles E. Stokes. “One Nation, Divided: Culture, Civic Institutions, and the Marriage Divide.” The Future of Children 25.2 (2015): 111-127.

Woolley, Alice. “Excluded by Definition: Same-Sex Couples and the Right to Marry.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 45.4 (1995): 471-524.

Published
2020-09-30
How to Cite
Lutz, D. (2020). The INSTITUTION OF THE FAMILY AND THE VIRTUOUS SOCIETY. Journal of Dharma, 45(3), 357-374. Retrieved from http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/3104