COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MORAL QUANDARIES
A CHRISTIAN ETHICAL REFLECTION
Keywords:
Apple Inc., Ashley Madison, Digital Information and Communication Technologies (DICT), Right to Privacy, Semiocracy, TechnophileAbstract
Technology, including digital information and communication technologies (DICT), is not morally neutral. It is built on a rejection of God and divine providence. Hence, it has no regard for theistic perspective; neither does it consider the bigger picture that classical philosophy and religion consider. Yet, DICT has demonstrated the potential to be a powerful driver of revolution and social change. Besides, the virtual reality created by DICT has somewhat helped to cushion the negative effects of loneliness and emotional instability caused by necessary physical separation. Nonetheless, the human community cannot be blind to DICT’s moral quandaries. How is DICT changing the understanding of common traditional notions like ‘selfhood’, ‘community’, ‘friends’, ‘truth’, and ‘fidelity’? Do we use these technologies to celebrate the height of human nobility, or we use them to descend into the abyss of immorality? At what point can we say ‘enough!’? Can we say ‘enough!’ again, or we are condemned to the technological imperative? These questions inspire this article’s reflection, from a Christian theological ethics perspective.
References
“Facebook Fuelling Divorce, Research Claims,” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/6857918/Facebook-fuelling-divorce-research-claims.html (accessed 22.02. 2016).
Anita L. Cloete, “Living in a Digital Culture: The Need for Theological Reflection,” HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 71, 2 (2015) 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i2.2073 (accessed 17.02.2016).
Deborah Hardoon, Sophia Ayele and Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva, An Economy for the 1%: How Privilege and Power in the Economy Drive Extreme Inequality and How This Can Be Stopped, Cowley, Oxford: Oxfam International, January 18, 2016, https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-1 (19.01.2016)
Ian Markham, Do Morals Matter? A Guide to Contemporary Religious Ethics, Malden, MA; Oxford; Victoria: Blackwell, 2007.
Joshua Isaac Kumwenda, “Social Media, Ethics and Development in the Postmodernist Malawian Society,” Journal of Development and Communication Studies 3, 1 (January-June, 2014).
Kenneth Einar Himma, “The Ethics of Tracing Hacker Attacks through the Machines of Innocent Persons,” IJIE International Journal of Information Ethics 2 (November 20014) 1-13, at 2, http://fiz1.fh-potsdam.de/volltext/ijie/05256.pdf (accessed 17.02.2016).
Lawrence Schmidt and Scott Marrato, The End of Ethics in a Technological Society, Montreal & Kingston; London; Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2008.
Leonardo de Chirico, “Ethics and the Internet: Starting from Theology,” European Journal of Theology 17, 2 (2008).
Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition (1979), 46, cited in Tim Woods, Beginning Postmodernism, Manchester; New York, NY: Manchester University Press, 1999.
Peter Fleissner, “On the Ambivalence of Information and Communication Technologies,” International Review of Information Ethics 7 (September 2009) 1-9, at 2, http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/007/15-fleissner.pdf (accessed 17.02.2006).
Pope Paul VI, Populorum Progressio, Encyclical on the Development of Peoples, no. 33, http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_pvi_enc_26031967_populorum.html (accessed 11.02. 2016).
