POLITICS AND ETHICS OF RESERVATION IN INDIA

Authors

  • James Massey Senate of Serampore College (University)

Keywords:

ethics, context, liberation, politics, reservation, dalits

Abstract

 This paper is an attempt to give ethical reflections on the ‘politics and ethics of reservation in India’ viewed through the prism of liberation paradigm. The ‘liberation perspective’ is the perspective of ‘various subaltern groups of India’ who are the victims of caste based social order of our society. Their victimization on the basis of caste has been perpetuated by religion on the one hand, and implemented by various political powers at different stages of our history, on the other hand. The ‘reservation’ or reservation policies, meant for the benefit of the subalterns, has developed in the past under the same ‘social order’, and carried on today by those people or groups who wield political power. It is important therefore to understand religio-political equation behind this ‘social order’ that ultimately influences the reservation policies. This equation has been understood from the perspective of the ‘subalterns,’ particularly of Dalits. The special focus is laid on both the politic and ethics of ‘reservation’ with a reference to the 1950 Presidential Order and the Backward Classes Commissions 

 

Author Biography

James Massey, Senate of Serampore College (University)

Prof. Dr. (habil) James Massey is Director of the Centre for Dalit/Minorities Studies (T) and the Community Contextual Communication Centre, New Delhi; Chairperson, Navjyoti Post-Graduate and Research Centre, Delhi (a federated faculty affiliated to Senate of Serampore College (University); Member, Assessment and Monitoring Authority (Planning Commission of India), and Former Member of National Committee for Minorities Government of India.

References

J. Russel Chandran, Christian Ethics, Delhi: ISPCK, 2011, 2.

Hunter P. Marbry, Christian Ethics: An Introductory Reader, Delhi: ISPCK, 2007, 18-19.

Soman Das, Christian Ethics and Indian Ethos, Delhi: ISPCK, 2009, xi.

Ralph T. H. Griffith, The Hymns of the Rigveda, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1986, 603. 5 Hume, Robert Ernest, trans., The Thirteen Principal Upanishads, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971, 233.

Zacharias, An Outline of Hinduism, Alwaye: Apostolic Seminary, 1956, 360.

Sen Makhan Lal, trans., Ramayana, Calcutta: Rupa & Co., 1989, 699-702.

Swami Vireawaranda, trans., Srimad Bhagwad-Gita, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math, 1987, 128.

Bumell Arthur Coke, trans., The Ordinances of Manu, New Delhi: Oriental Books, 1971, XXIII. Also see Zacharias, Outline of Hinduism, 323

Anuloma and Pratiloma, Srivastava, Suresh Narain, Harijans in Indian Society, Lucknow: Upper India Publishing House, 1980, 25-28.

Al-Beruni, India (abridged edition of Dr. Edward C. Sachan's English Translation and edited by Qeyamuddin Ahmed), New Delhi: National Book Trust, 1988, 46.

Marc Galanter, Competing Equalities in Law and the Backward Classes in Media, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984, 19.

John William Kay, Christianity in India, London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1859, 375.

Religion and Society 36, 4 (December 1989), 26-28.

R. Sangeetha Rao, Caste System in India, New Delhi: India Publishers and Distributors, 1989, 106-116.

Louise Ouwerkerk, The Untouchables of India, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945, l6-29.

G. S. Lokhande, Bhimrao Ramji Ambedhar, New Delhi: Intellectual Publishing House, 1982, 181.

J. H. Hutton, Caste in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1946, 167.

G. S. Ghurye, Caste and Race in India, Bombay: Popular Prakashan, 1979, 306.

Harold R. Isaacs, India’s Ex-Untouchables, Bombay: Asian Publishing House, 1965, 36.

Bulletin of the Christian Institute for Religious Studies 20, 1 (January 1991), 3-6.

Upendra Baxi, “Political Justice, Legislative, Reservation for Scheduled Castes and Social Change,” Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Lectures, 1978, University of Madras, 9.

Zelliot Eleanor, “The Psychological Dimension of the Buddhist Movement in India” in G. A. Oddie, ed., Religion in South Asia-Religious Conversion and Revival Movements in South Asia in Medieval And Modern Times, New Delhi: Manohar, 1991,188.

Report of the Backward Classes Commission, Government of India, 1980, vii.

H. J. Gans, More Equality, New York: Pantheon, 1973, quoted in Report of the Backward Classes, 22.

Moses Brindavan C., “New Delhi’s Elite’s Battle for Status Quo” in Defenders of Mandal Commission: A Collection of Articles, Views and News, Madras: LEAS, 33-34.

B. R. Ambedkar, Dr. Babasahab Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, vol. 3, compiled by Vasant Moon, Bombay: Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, 1989, 3-150. 55 B. R. Ambedkar, “Ranade, Gandhi and Jinnah” in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, vol. 1, 222.

Constituent Assembly Debates, Official Report, Book No. 5, Vol. XI, 14-111949 to 26-11-1949, New Delhi: Lok Sabha Scretariat, 1999, 979.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-30

How to Cite

Massey, J. (2013). POLITICS AND ETHICS OF RESERVATION IN INDIA . Journal of Dharma, 38(3), 319–336. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/95