Arguments for God's Existence
.
Keywords:
God, Existence, ArgumentsAbstract
Possibly many of the professors of rational rheology presume they have nothing new to learn. Many years of teaching may give people the feeling that in their respective provinces they have acquired a sort of infallibility. Human psychology is such that a calculated repetition of errors gives people the impression of unshaken truth, if not of downright infallibility. Of course, many specialists may claim that their certainty is upright rather than downright.
References
Chandradhar Sharma, A critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: M. Banarsidas, re-print 1987
V.P. Miceli, The Gods of Atheism, Roman Catholic Books, P.O. Box 255, Harrison, New York.
P. Balasubramamiam, The Concept of Presupposition: A Study (Madras: Radhakrishnan Institute for Advanced Study of Philosophy, University of Madras, 1984), pp. 109-116.
J. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Ch.21
D. Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, sect. 4-7
P. Edwards, ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy, v.l, p.lO 1
B. Russell" An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Unwin Hyman Ltd. Pbk 1980
T. H. Irvin, Aristotle's First Principles (Clarendon pbk., New York, 1990), p.147
R. Swinburne, "Knowledge from Experience and the Problem of Evil," in The Rationality of Religious Belief, ed. W. J. Abraham and S. W. Holtzer (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987)
