PHILOSOPHICAL BACKGROUND OF INTERRELIGIOUS CONFLICTS AND THEIR RESOLUTION
.
Keywords:
INTERRELIGIOUS, CONFLICTS, RESOLUTIONAbstract
The persons with whom we have to deal have not merely a different way of thinking and feeling, a different conviction and attitude, but also a different perception of the world, a different recognition and order of meaning, a different touch from the regions of existence, a different faith, a different soil. To affirm all this in the midst of the hard situations of conflict without relaxing their real seriousness is the way by which we may .be permitted to touch on the other's truth or untruth, justice or injustice.
References
Maurice Friedman, Intercultural Dialogue and the Human lmage(New Delhi: 1995), 102.
Paul Knitter, "Interreligious Dialogue and the Unity of Humanity., Journal ofDharma, vo. 17, 1992, 283ff.
Ashok K. Gangadean, "The Hermeneutics of Comparative Ontology", in Religious Pluralism and Truth, ed. by Thomas Dean, Delhi: 1997, 234ff.
The Debate of King Milinda, Ed. by Bhikku Pesala, Delhi: 1991,4f.
Sebastian Painadath, "Ashrams a Movement of Spiritual Integration" Concilium, (August 1994), 36-46
Mary Ann Stenger, "Gadamer's Hermeneutics as a Model for CrossCultural Understanding and Truth in Religion" Religious Pluralism, 151-17
Anthony Savari, "The Diatopical Hermeneutics: R. Panikkar's Response !o the Scientific Study of Religions," Journal of Dharma, vol. XXI, 1996, 198- 203.
Cited by K.Luke, "Ahimsa" in Indian Capuchin Research Forum, vol. I, ed. by Johnson 1., Bangalore: 1991,139
