THE SOCIAL MEANING OF THE MIDDLE WAY

The Madhyamika Critique of Indian Ontologies of Identity and Difference

Authors

  • Douglas L Berger Temple University

Keywords:

THE MIDDLE WAY, Madhyamika Critique

Abstract

The essays of Bibhuti Singh Yadav 1943-1999) represent Buddhism as a social invective against various Indian ontologies that either directly underwrote caste society or did nothing to upset the StatUS quo. Specifically, Madhyamika Buddhism, of Nagarjuna's and Candrakirti's Prasangika variety, rejects both the hierarchical essentialism Of caste society and the escapism of a reclusive. renunciate and metasocial nirvana, leaving the individual to demand social equality on religious grounds. The real significance of dissolving the boundaries between samsara and nirvana in Madhyamika lies in its opening the way for Buddhists to return from the forests to their homes and speak to society in its own language, but speak as reformers, so that the call to social justice could re-enter the Indian life-world on Indian terms.

Author Biography

Douglas L Berger, Temple University

Dr. Douglas L Berger teaches at the Department of Religious Studies of Temple University, Japan

References

('Methodic Deconstruction." Interpretation in Religion. Shlomo Biderman and Ben-Ami Scharfstein eds. E.J. Brill, Leiden, 1992, 129-168; 162.

Gerald James Larson, India's Agony over Religion. SUNY Press,. Albany, 1995. 26-7.

TR.V. Murti (Yadav's doctoral advisor), The Central Philosophy of Buddhism: A Study of the Madhvamika System. George Allen & Unwin, Ltd. London, 1960, 131-2: Sitansu Cakravorty. 'The Madhyamika Catuskoti or Tetralemma." Journal of Indian Philosophv. vol. 8, 1980, 303-06;

B.K. Matilal. Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Clarendon. Oxford, 1986, 48, 66-7, 88-9;

Mark Siderits, "The Madhyamika Critique of Epistemology l." Journal of Indian Philosophy. vol. 8, 307.

http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Asia]AsiaBerg.htm.

Yadav, "Vallabha's Positive Response to Buddhism." Journal ofDharma. vol. 18, no. 2, 1994, 113-137; 117.

B.K. Matilal, The word and the World Oxford, Delhi, 1990, 155.

Yadav and William C. Allen, "Between Vasabandhu and Kumarila." Journal ofDharnta. vol. 20 no. 2, 1995. 154-77, 156

Siderits' "Matilal on Nagarjuna." Relativism, Suffering and Beyond: Essavs in Memory of Bimal K. Matilal. P. Bilimoria and J.N. Mohanty, eds. Oxford, Delhi. 1997, 69-92; 71

J N. Mohanty, the Self Become an Object?" Essays on Indian Philosophy: Traditional and Modern. Oxford, Delhi, 1993, 68-74.

Daya Krishna. "Adhyasa-A Non-Advaitic Beginning in Sankara's Vedanta." Indian Philosophy: A Counter Perspective. Oxford. Delhi, 1991, 156-63;

" Relativism. Suffering and Betond: Essays in Memon of Bimal K, Matilal. P, Bilimoria and J.N. Mohanty, eds. Oxford, Delhi, 1997, 252-77.

Ashis Nandy. The Intimate Enemy: The Loss and Discoverv of Self under Colonialism. Oxford. Delhi. 1983. 107.

A L. Herman, An Introduction to Buddhist Thought: A Philosophic History Of Indian Buddhism. University Press of America, Lanham, 1983, 283-86.

Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm over Critical Buddhism. Jamie Hubbard and Paul L. Swanson. eds., Umversity of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1997.

V. Suba Rao's The Philosophv of the Sentence and its Parts. Munshiram Manoharial, New Delhi, 1969.

Downloads

Published

2001-09-30

How to Cite

Berger, D. L. (2001). THE SOCIAL MEANING OF THE MIDDLE WAY: The Madhyamika Critique of Indian Ontologies of Identity and Difference. Journal of Dharma, 26(3), 282–310. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/677