AN IRANIAN CULTURAL APPROACH TO MANICHAEAN GNOSTICISM
Keywords:
MANICHAEAN GNOSTICISMAbstract
The cultural origin of Manichaeism was first in Babylonia and Mesopotamia. Mani, although of an Iranian monarchy family, was nurtured in the Gnostic society of Babylonia. He was an expert intellectual and artist who had an undeniable and durable influence on Iranian culture through writing Gnostic works, paintings, calligraphy and tadhib ‘bookgilding’). Manichaeism and its religious-gnostic ideas, however, when reached the territory of Persia, naturally took on a Persian tincture. This can be clearly seen through the terms and the nomenclature of Manichaean deities such as Zurwān, Ohrmizdbay, Mihr Yazd, etc. One can see Iranian cultural influence on Manichaeism through its original themes and motifs and also through the functions of the deities. Zoroastrian dualistic doctrine and its impact on the Manichaean approach are undeniable. The specific functions of deities such as Zurwān and Mihr Yazd, and their reflections on Manichaeism are noticeable as well. In other words, the characteristics and functions of Zoroastrian deities match those of the Manichaean deities that were given their names. For instance, Zurwān, according to Iranian and Armenian sources, is a God of Time with an unlimited realm, who is the origin of Ohrmazd and Ahriman, twin gods of Good and Evil. In this way, Ohrmizdbay in Manichaean cosmogony is comparable with Zoroastrian Ohrmazd. The former is the symbol of forgetfulness and gaining knowledge to be redeemed, and he is the first deity to fight with Ahriman, while the latter is the Lord of knowledge and wisdom and is in conflict with Ahriman too.
References
P. O. Skjaervo, “Iranian Elements in Manichaeism” in Au Carrefour des Religions: Melanges offrets a Philippe Gignoux, Res Orientales (Bures-sur-Yvette 1995), vol. 7, 236f.
H. Zahener, Zurwan: A Zoroastrian Dilemma, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955.
G. Widengren, Mani and Manichaeism, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1965, 69-74;
The Seleucid, Parthian and Sassanian Periods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, 955-990;
M. Tardieu, Le Manicheisme, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997, 98-101.
Gershewitch, The Avestan Hymn to Mithra, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954, 28ff.
W. Sundermann, “Manichaean Cosmogony” in Encyclopedia Iranica, ed. E. Yarshater, Colombia: Colombia University, 1993, vol. 6, 89-94
G. Gnoli, “Manichaean and Persian Religions” in Messina Congress on Gnostic Origins, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1966, 123f.;
H-Ch. Puech, Sur le manicheisme et autres essais, Paris: Flammarion, 1999, 143f.
Hans Jonas, Gnostic Religion, Boston: Beacon Press, 1970.
J. Petro Culiano, “Gnosticism from Middle Ages to the Present Day” in The Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. M. Eliade, vol. 5, New York-London: Macmillan, 1987, 575f. Culiano, “Gnosticism from Middle Ages to the Present Day,” 576. See also M. Desjardins, “Ummal-Kitab” in Acta Iranica (Leiden-Teheran-Liege, 1977), vol. 7, 238f.
“Jahan-o kar-e jahan jomle hich dar hic hast / hezar bar man in nokte kardeam tahqiq,” Dīvān-i Hāfez, ed. Qazvīnī-Ghanī, Tehran: Anjoman-e Khoshnevīsān, 1993, 214.
“Exegesis ascribed to Imām Ja`far Sādiq” in Collected Works of ‘Abd alRahmān Sulamī, ed. Paul Noya, 2nd ed., Tehran: Iran University Press, 1994, vol. 1, 48.
A. Esmailpour, ed. and trans., Ā’īn-e Gnosī va Mānavī (Gnosticism and Manichaeism), Tehran: Fekr-e Rooz, 1994, 60.
R. Nicholson, Mystics of Islam, New York: Schoken, 1975, 14-20.
Ibn-i Nadīm, al-Fihrist, Tehran: Air Kabir, 1978, 660.
H. Corbin, Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis, London: Kegan Paul, 1983, 153.
H. Corbin, “Aql-e Sorkh” in Encyclopedia Iranica, vol. 1, ed. E. Yarshater, Colombia: Colombia University, 1993, 87f.
“Risālat al-Ghurbat al-Gharbīyya” in Collected Philosophical and Mystic Works of Suhrawardī, ed. Henry Corbin, Téhéran-Paris: Association de Irano-France, 1977, 274-297;
H. Corbin, “Aql-e Sorkh,” 159; H. Corbin, Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth: From Mazdean Iran to Shiite Iran, trans. Nancy Pearson, 2nd ed., Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989, 87f.
H. Corbin, Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis, London: Kegan Paul, 1983, 160-161.
Ibn-i Nadīm, al-Fihrist, Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1987, 602-603.
G. Haloun and Henning, W. B., “The Compendium of the Doctrines and Styles of Teaching of Mani, the Buddha of Light” in Asia Major, London: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 1952, 209.
M. Boyce, A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian, Leiden: E. J. Brill / Téhéran-Liège: Biblioteque Pahlavi, 1975, 182.
H.-J. Klimkeit, “On the Nature of Manichaean Art” in M. Heuser and H.-J. Klimkeit, Studies in Manichaean Literature and Art, Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz, 1988, 288.
G. Quispel, “Mani: The Apostle of Jesus Christ” in Manichaean Studies, vol. 3, ed. L. Cirillo and A. Van Tongerloo, Turnhout: Brepols, 1997, 6f.;
E. Rose, Die manichaische Christologie (Studies in Oriental Religions 5), Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz, 1979, 194-199.
