FEMININE EPISTEMOLOGY WITHIN ACADEMY

An Alternative Way of Pedagogical Practice

Authors

  • Naznin Indian School of Mines

Keywords:

Epistemology, Gender Sensitivity, Pedagogical Practice

Abstract

The role of women in the field of teaching has been undervalued and denigrated for a long time by educational experts. Though the preponderance of women in teaching enabled them to apply their distinct ways of learning and teaching to the profession effectively, they were not recognized either in the historical texts of education or in the philosophy of education. The study analyses the traditional teaching patterns that persist and dominate contemporary pedagogical practice. Accordingly, women teachers are coerced to adopt a 'masculine' pedagogy, neglecting unique feminine qualities and abilities in education. Ensuing traditional patterns not only deprive women from exhibiting their inherent abilities but also impede positive changes in the quality of teaching. It is argued that the experience of mothering in the private sphere offers alternative ways of remodelling the pedagogical practices, facilitating professional educators in developing gender sensitivity, and sensitivity to different learning abilities among students.

Author Biography

Naznin, Indian School of Mines

Naznin is a Research Scholar at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad. Her research interests in Applied Ethics include Ethics of Care in Pedagogy and Educational Ethics, Philosophical Aspects of Education, Social and Cognitive Aspects of Education, Educational Psychology, and Ethics in Teacher’s Education.

References

Madeleine R. Grumet, Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching, Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1988, 45.

Jane Tompkins, “Me and My Shadow,” New Literary History 19, 1 (1987), 169-178.

Mary Field Belenky, et al., Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, New York: Basic Books, 1986, 20.

Jane Roland Martin, “Excluding Women from the Educational Realm,” Harvard Educational Review 52, 2 (July 1982), 133-148.

Sigmund Freud, Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, Standard Edition, VII. 1905; Cited in Mary D. Salter Ainsworth, “Object Relations, Dependency, and Attachment: A Theoretical Review of the Infant-Mother Relationship,” Child Development 40 (1969), 969-1025.

Nancy Julia Chodorow, Reproduction of Mothering Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978; Dorothy Dinnerstein, Mermaid and Minotaur, New York: Harper and Row, 1976.

Fatimah Kelleher, “Women and Teaching Profession: International Perspectives on the Feminisation Debate” (Paper presented at fourth International Policy Dialogue Forum of the International Task Force on Teachers for EFA, New Delhi, May 2012), 29-30.

Fatimah Kelleher, Women and the Teaching Profession Exploring the Feminisation Debate, London: Commonwealth Secretariat and UNESCO, 2011, 5.

Sandra Acker, “Carry on Caring: The Work of Women Teachers,” British Journal of Sociology of Education 16, 1 (July 2006), 21-36.

Morwenna Griffiths, “The Feminisation of Teaching and the Practice of Teaching: Threat or Opportunity?” Educational Theory 56, 4 (November 2006), 387-405.

Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, “Epistemology or Bust: A Maternal Feminist Knowing of Knowing,” The Journal of Religion, 72, 2 (April 1992), 229-247.

Elizabeth Anderson, “Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense,” Hypatia 10, 3 (1995), 50-84.

Alisson M. Jaggar and Susan R. Bordo, Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1989, 145.

John Dewey, The Essential Dewey, Volume 11: Ethics, Logic, Psychology, eds. L. Hickman and T. Alexandra, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005, 332.

Martin Slattery, Key Ideas in Sociology, London: Nelson Thornes, 2003, 159.

Elizabeth Harrison, A Study of Child-Nature: From the Kindergarten Standpoint, Chicago: The Lakeside Press, 1895, 11.

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958, 23. Cited in Morwenna Griffiths, “The Feminisation of Teaching and the Practice of Teaching: Threat or Opportunity?” Educational Theory 56, 4 (November 2006), 387-405.

Niall Hanlon, Masculinities, Care and Equality: Identity and Nurture in Men’s Lives, Ireland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Wendy Hollway, The Capacity to Care: Gender and Ethical Subjectivity, New York: Routledge, 2006, 83.

Nel Noddings, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, London: University of California Press, 1984, 180-186.

Diemut Elisabet Bubeck, Care, Gender and Justice, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Joan Tronto and Berenice Fisher, "Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring," in Circle of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, eds., Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson, New York: Oxford University Press1990. Virginia Held, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Grace Clement, Care, Autonomy and Justice: Feminism and the Ethic of Care, Boulder: Westview Press, 1996. Cited in Tony Monschinsky, Education in Hope: Critical Pedagogies and the Ethic of Care, New York: Peter Lang, 2010, 88.

Rout E. Groenhout and Marya Brewar, Philosophy Feminism and Faith, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003, 155.

Benjamin Wright and Barbara Sherman, “Who Is the Teacher?” Theory into Practice 2, 2 (1963), 71.

John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology, New York, Modern Library, 1922, 42.

Maurice Hamington, “Loyalty to Care: Royce and Political Approach to Feminist Care Ethics,” Pragmatism Today 5, 1 (2014), 2.

Garrett Ward Sheldon, Encyclopedia of Political Thought, New York: Facts on Files, Inc. 2001, 87.

Chris Haywood and Mairtin Mc an Ghaill, Men and Masculinities: Theory Research and Social Practice, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003, 64.

Francesca M. Cancian, “The Feminization of Love,” Signs, 11, 4 (1986), 695.

Carolyn Shrewsbury, “What is Feminist Pedagogy?” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 21, 3 & 4 (1993), 8-16.

Ann Lane, "The Feminism of Hannah Arendt," Democracy 3, 3(1983), 107-17.

Elina Lahelma, “Lack of Male Teachers: Problem for Students or Teachers?” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 8, 2 (2000), 173-186.

SaraDelamont, “Gender and the Discourse of Derision,” Research Papers in Education 14, 1 (1999), 3-21.

Fatihma Kelleher, Women and the Teaching Profession: Exploring the Feminization Debate, Commonwealth Secretariat and UNESCO, 2011, 18, 141.

Karena Foss and Sonja Foss, “Personal Experience as Evidence in Feminist Scholarship,” Western Journal of Communication 58 (1994) 39-43.

Shirley Parry, “Feminist Pedagogy and Techniques for the Changing Classroom,” Women’s Studies Quarterly 24, 3 & 4 (1996), 45-54. 53Shrewsbury, “What is Feminist Pedagogy?” 8.

Ernest Chapman, “Nurse Education: A Feminist Approach,” Nurse Education Today 17, 3 (1997), 209-214.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

Naznin. (2016). FEMININE EPISTEMOLOGY WITHIN ACADEMY: An Alternative Way of Pedagogical Practice. Journal of Dharma, 41(3), 273–296. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/395