PATENTABILITY OF BIOTECHNOLOGY INVENTIONS

Indian Ethical Guidelines

Authors

  • Helen P Azyu Research Scholar, School of Law, CHRIST(Deemed to be University), Bangalore
  • Avishek Assistant Professor at School of law, CHRIST(Deemed to be University, Bangalore.

Keywords:

Biotechnology Inventions, Patents, Ethics, Morality, ICMR, Bioethics Principles, Patent Protection, Public orders

Abstract

Advances in technology have made patenting of biotechnology inventions mandatory. The patent law system contains general clauses prohibiting the patenting of inventions contrary to public order or morality. Recent years have brought numerous debates on limiting the possibility of patent protection for biotechnology inventions for ethical reasons. The existing literature examines bioethical justification in terms of the principles of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice. The primary purpose of this study is to explore the uncertainty of ethics guidelines provided by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and section 3(b) of the Indian Patents Act 1970 and the applicability of the bioethics principles.

Author Biographies

Helen P Azyu, Research Scholar, School of Law, CHRIST(Deemed to be University), Bangalore

Research Scholar, School of Law, CHRIST(Deemed to be University), Bangalore

Avishek, Assistant Professor at School of law, CHRIST(Deemed to be University, Bangalore.

Assistant Professor, School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore.

References

Ali, F. et al. “Rejected in India: What the Indian Patent Office Got Right on Pharmaceuticals Patent Applications. 2016.” Bengaluru: AzimPremji University (2017): 19-24.

Beauchamp, Tom. “The Principle of Beneficence in Applied Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/principle-beneficence/>.

Chakravarty, Ankita, and Ambedkar Bhavan. “Unethical Clinical Trials in India: A Selective Preliminary Overview.” Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics (2017): 66-68.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. “International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects.” Geneva: Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences, 1993.

Indian Council of Medical Research. “Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects.” New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 2006.

Fleischacker, Samuel. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.

Forsberg, Ellen-Marie, et al. “Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views between the Patent System and the Wider Society.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2018): 1551-1576.

Gupta, Mona, Divya Srivastava, and Arvind Singh Kushwah. “Bioethics and Patent Law: USA, UK and India. A Bibliometric Analysis.” Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 4.2 (2013): 1-8.

Guyer, Paul. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Iserson, Kenneth V. “Principles of Biomedical Ethics.” Emergency Medicine Clinics 17.2 (1999): 283-306.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Kohli, Tushar. “India: Rejections Under Section 3(b) of the Indian Patent Act.” Mondaq, 23 April. 2022,

Komrad, Mark S. “A Defence of Medical Paternalism: Maximising Patients’ Autonomy.” Journal of Medical Ethics 9.1 (1983): 38-44.

Macer, Darryl R. J. “Inventions, Patents and Morality.” Biotechnology-Volume XIII: Fundamentals in Biotechnology 13 (2009): 71-78.

Mandal, Jharna, Dinoop Korol Ponnambath, and Subhash Chandra Parija. “Bioethics: A Brief Review.” Tropical Parasitology 7.1 (2017): 5-7.

Mandal, Jharna, et al. “Bioethics: A Brief Review.” Tropical Parasitology, US National Library of Medicine, 2017.

Martins, Paulo Nuno. “A Concise Study on the History of Bioethics: Some Reflections.” Middle East Journal of Business 13.1 (2018): 35-37.

Murugeshan, Namratha, et al. “Section 3(b) Rejections: Patent Office Rejects Claims for Nicotine Delivery Devices.” Spicy IP, 12 January 2022: <https://spicyip.com/2022/01/section-3b-rejections-patent-office-rejects-claims-for-nicotine-delivery-devices.html>

Indian Council of Medical Research. “National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants.” Indian Council of Medical Research, 2017.

Indian Council of Medical Research & Department of Biotechnology India. “National Guidelines for Stem Cell Research.” Indian Council of Medical Research & Department of Biotechnology India, 2017.

Patel, Hetal, and Sandesh Lodha. “Case Study on Rejected Patents in India.” Intellectual Property Rights-Patent. Intech Open, 2020.

Rigaud, Nicolas. “Biotechnology: Ethical and Social Debates”. OECD International Futures Project on The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. OECD International Futures Programme 2008.

Sanmukhani, J., and C. B. Tripathi. “Ethics in Clinical Research: The Indian Perspective.” Indian Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences 73.2 (2011): 125-130.

Sreenivasulu, N. S. Law Relating to Biotechnology. Delhi: Online Education Oxford Academic, 2016.

Vaughn, Lewis. Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases. Vol. 58. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Wilson, Entrican and Denis. “Kant and Hume on Morality,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Azyu, H. P., & Chakraborty, A. (2023). PATENTABILITY OF BIOTECHNOLOGY INVENTIONS: Indian Ethical Guidelines. Journal of Dharma, 48(1), 125–144. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/3859