GENDER JUSTICE AND WOMEN EMPOWERMENT
Legal Measures in India
Keywords:
Autonomy, Empowerment, Feminism, Gender Justice, Laws, Patriarchal, ProtectionismAbstract
Educating the girl child, creating job opportunities, putting women in decision making roles, and making pro-women laws protecting them from oppression were some of the many steps that were designed for women's empowerment. But many years down the line the quest for a just society that values women and accords them the necessary dignity and respect is still on. A paternalistic approach with the assumption that women were victims of the social divide was adopted to rid women of their troubles. Being vulnerable they required protection; and so a number of measures were required and adopted to empower her. The authors argue that the flaw in the law is in its paternalistic approach, which does not accord autonomy of self-governance or self-direction. The autonomy needs to be redefined as a relative idea where a just and compassionate society nurtures its members and creates social conditions that strengthens autonomous decisions, instead of impeding them, for the realization of their full potential. It can neither be a masculine versus feminine argument nor be attained in isolation.
References
Constituent Assembly Debates: Official Report, Vol. VII, 1948-49, Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1950, 511-15, 540-52.
Constituent Assembly Debates, Vol. VII, 538, 540-552, debated on 23rd November 1948.
B. Shiva Rao, Framing of India's Constitution – Select Documents, Vol. 1, Delhi, Universal Law Publishing 1967 Reprint 2006, 162.
Sadhna Arya, Women, Gender, Equality and the State, New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publication, 2000, 6.
Paula Banerjee, "Women's Autonomy: Beyond Rights and Representations," in The Politics of Autonomy: Indian Experiences, Ranbir Samaddar, ed., New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2005, 49.
Draft Article 19 and present Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
State of Bombay v. Narasu Appamali AIR 1952 Bom. 84.
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, (16.02.2016).
Geetha Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, 1999 2(SCC) 228.
T Sareethav. T Venkata Subbaiah AIR 1983 AP 356, Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan AIR 1984 SC 1562.
C. Masilamani Mudliar v. Idol of Sri S S Thirukoil (1996) 8 SCC 525.
Ahmedabad Women's Action Group v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 573.
Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985) 3 SCR 844.
Criminal Appeal No. 564-565 of 2015.
AIR 1996 SC 1864.
AIR 1985 SC 1618.
Tukaram and another v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 185.
Phul Singh v. State of Haryana AIR 1980 SC 249.
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hrijibhai v. State of Gujarat AIR 1983 SC 753.
Premchand v. State of Haryana AIR 1989 SC 937.
Ratna Kapoor, "Gender Justice, Interrupted,"<http://www.the hindu. com/opinion/lead/gender-justice-interrupted/article 4559007. ece> (17.10.2015).
Justice Yatindra Singh, "Gender Justice – A Legal Panorama," a talk delivered in the colloquium on "Gender and Law" organized by the National Judicial Academy, British Council and Allahabad High Court at JTRI, Lucknow on 14 Oct. 2001 (16.02. 2016).
Claire Dalton, "Deconstructing Contract Doctrine," in Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender, Katharine T. Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy, ed., New York: Harper Collins, 1992 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_theory#cite_ref-Dalton2_ 81-0> (16.02.2016).
Katherine T. Bartlett, "Feminist Legal Methods," Vol. 103, Harvard Law Review, 829, (February 1990), 836-37, (9.02.2016).
Lucinda M. Finley, "Breaking Women's Silence in Law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning," Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 4011, 1989 <http://digitalcommons.law.yale. edu/fss_papers/4011> (4.3.2016).
Indira Jaising, "Gender Justice and the Supreme Court," in Supreme but not Infallible in Honour of the Supreme Court of India, B N Kirpal et al., eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, 288.
