A Socio-Legal Review


  • Suvidutt M S amity law school, noida
  • Aditya Tomer Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida


Hate Speech, Free Speech, Indian Secularism, Inclusive Society, Supreme Court


Hate speech is viewed in the context of institutionalised prejudice and a community’s eventual marginalisation – be it politically, socially, economically, religiously, culturally, racially, sexually, etc. The best method to combat religious hate speech in a democratic setting like India is to preserve, embrace, and practise ‘constitutional values’. It is pointless to promote new laws that prohibit or restrict freedom of expression in order to avert attacks on religion. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has extensively commented on religion, secularism, and hate speech. The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16 addresses hate speech by urging the development of peaceful and inclusive communities, universal access to justice, and effective, responsible, and inclusive institutions at all levels. The United Nations’ efforts to make the SDGs a reality also contribute to fighting the issue of hate speech as part of accomplishing these interrelated goals that assist in establishing a peaceful and resilient society. This paper elucidates the heated arguments involved in the hate speech that is antithetical to secularism, inclusive societies, and sustainable development.

Author Biographies

Suvidutt M S, amity law school, noida

PhD Scholar in Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida

Aditya Tomer, Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida

Additional Director/ Joint Head of Institution of Amity Law School, Noida. He is the author of 7 books and 2 monographs.


A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu v. State of A.P. Ramaswamy, 1996 9 SCC 548 (Supreme Court of India 1996).

Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen, 1996 (3) SCC 665 (Supreme Court of India 1996).

Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (dead) by LRs. & Ors., (2017) 2 SCC 629 (Supreme Court of India 2017).

Amish Devgan v. Union of India, 2021 (1) SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India).

Basu, D.D. Commentary on the Constitution of India. Wadhwa & Co. New Delhi, 2007.

Bhatia, Gautam. Offend, Shock, or Disturb – Free Speech under the Indian Constitution. Oxford University Press. New Delhi, 2016.

Dr Ramesh Yeshwant Praboo v. Shri Prabhakar Kashinath Kunte & Ors, 1996 AIR 1113 (Supreme Court of India 1995).

Galpin, Caitlin. International Law and Human Rights. Hate Speech as a Symptom and Cause of Hatred. Munich, GRIN Verlag, 2014.

Handyside v. The United Kingdom, ECHR 5, 1976.

Hurd, Heidi and Moore, S. Michael. “Punishing Hatred and Prejudice” Stanford Law Review, 56, 2004, p.1128.

Indira Sawhney Etc. v. Union of India and Ors., AIR 1993 SC 477 (Supreme Court of India 1993).

Iyer, V. R. Krishna. Law and Life. Universal Law Publishing. New Delhi, 2008.

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, 1973 (4) SCC 225 (Supreme Court of India 1973).

Law Commission of India Report No.267 on Hate Speech, March 2017.

Mill, J.S. On Liberty and Utilitarianism Bantam Classic. New York, 2008, p.4.

Mohd. Aslam v. Union of India, 1996 (2) SCC 749 (Supreme Court of India 1996).

New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).

O.K. Ghosh v. E. X. Joseph, AIR 1963 SC 812 (Supreme Court of India 1963).

Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2014 SC 1591 (Supreme Court of India 2014).

Ramji Lal Modi v. State of U.P, AIR 1957 SC 620 (Supreme Court of India 1957).

Shukla, Dr. Girjesh. “Hate Crime: Politico-Legal Dimension of Hate Speech.” Journal of Parliamentary and Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming, June 10, 2011.

Sivakumar, S. Press Law and Journalists. Gurgaon: Universal Law Publishing, 2015.

S.R Bommai v. Union of India, 1994 (2) SCR 644; AIR 1994 SC 1918: 1994 (3) SCC 1 (Supreme Court of India 1994).

State of Karnataka vs. Dr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia, 2004 (4) SCC 684 (Supreme Court of India 2004).

St. Xaviers College Society v. State of Gujarat, 1974 (1) SCC 717 (Supreme Court of India 1974).

Supdt. Central Prison v. Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia, AIR 1960 SC 633 (Supreme Court of India 1960).

United Nations, Report of the World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen, 1995.

United Nations, Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech, May 2019.

Valsamma Paul (Mrs) v. Cochin University, 1996 3 SCC545 (Supreme Court of India 1996).

Weinman, Michael. “State Speech vs. Hate Speech: What to do about Words that Wound?.” Essays in Philosophy, Vol 7, Issue 1, Article 18, 2006, p.14.

Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Brijmohan Ram Das Mehra, 1976 2 SCC 17 (Supreme Court of India 1976).




How to Cite

M S, S., & Tomer, A. (2022). RELIGIOUS HATE SPEECH vs PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE: A Socio-Legal Review. Journal of Dharma, 47(4), 473–492. Retrieved from