POST-RELIGIOUS CRITIQUE OF RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY

Jürgen Habermas’s Concept of ‘Religion as Critique’

Authors

  • Pius V Thomas Assam (Central) University, Silchar

Keywords:

Democracy, Conceptual-Scape, Deliberative Democracy, Religion, Post-Religious

Abstract

Discussions on religion’s place in democracy in the backdrop of dominant secularist ideals either register an inconclusive gist or they are transposed to what is often believed to be more open and transparent ‘weak comparative schemes,’ connected with liberal or communitarian perspectives. But, when the question of the possible interactive space between religion and democracy is integrated to the theoretical projects aimed at the critique of modernity, sometimes, it assumes a strong/deep hermeneutic claim that can situate a mutually constructive critique between religion and democracy. Critical philosopher and prominent second generation Frankfurt School1 theorist Jürgen Habermas’s concept of ‘religion as critique’ is such a deep interpretative engagement which tries to attach and contrast the meaningful realm of religion/religious discourses with the conceptual imagination of ‘critical modernity.’ 

Author Biography

Pius V Thomas, Assam (Central) University, Silchar

Dr. Pius V. Thomas is Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Assam (Central) University, Silchar. His current research interests are focused on themes dealing with Philosophical Concepts of Interculturality and Critique, Democracy and Religion and Ethics and Reason.

References

Jürgen Habermas’s idea of postnational constellation expressed in Jürgen Habermas, Postnational Constellation, trans. Max Pensky, London: Polity, 2001.

Fred Dallmayr, “Jacques Derrida’s Legacy: Democracy to Come,” in Kailash C. Baral and C. Radhakrishnan, eds., Theory after Derrida, London: Routledge, 2010, 36.

Jacques Derrida, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason, trans. Pascal-Anne Brault and Michael Naas, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.

Bonnie Honig, “Difference, Dilemmas and the Politics of Home,” in Seyla Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, 258.

Seyla Benhabib, “Introduction,” in Seyla Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, 5. See also Michael Dusche, (2010), Identity Politics in India and Europe, New Delhi: Sage, 2010, 93-94.

Jürgen Habermas, Inclusion of the Other, Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff, eds., London: Polity, 1998, 240.

Jürgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon, 1975, 121.

Eduardo Mendieta, “Introduction,” in Jürgen Habermas, Religion and Rationality, ed., Eduardo Mendieta, London: Polity, 2002, 23.

Jürgen Habermas, Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity, 1987, 61. Jürgen Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking, trans. William Mark Hohengarten, London: Polity, 1994, 51.

Jürgen Habermas, Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. Ciaran Cronin, London: Polity, 2008, 6.

Paulskirche, Frankfurt, 14 October 2001, Trans. Kermit Snelson, www.sueddeutsche.de/aktuell/sz/artikel86740.php

Jürgen Habermas, “A Conversation About the God and the World,” in Religion and Rationality, London: Polity, 2002, 150.

Jürgen Habermas, “Transcendence,” in Religion and Rationality, ed. Eduardo Mendeita, London: Polity, 2002, 77.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-30

How to Cite

Thomas, P. V. (2010). POST-RELIGIOUS CRITIQUE OF RELIGION AND DEMOCRACY: Jürgen Habermas’s Concept of ‘Religion as Critique’. Journal of Dharma, 35(2), 115–129. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/346