DUAL ETHICS IN ROMANS 13
Keywords:
Romans 13, Dual Ethics, RomansAbstract
Seemingly Rom 13 demands the people’s unconditional submission to the state.[1] But what if the state’s policy contradicts God’s teachings? I first survey various answers to the problem. As we will see, those answers assume that what is morally wrong for the state to order is morally wrong for the people to follow. I argue, however, that there can be cases where a state’s policy is morally wrong while the people’s submission to it is morally right. I distinguish between the ethical standards for the state and those for the people. I point out the following: The dual ethics protects conscientious people from moral blame for having obeyed the authority. The dual ethics makes it impossible to appeal to Rom 13 to justify tyranny. The dual ethics is also compatible with the various answers. Finally, I show that some New Testament passages support the dual ethics.
References
Klaus Nürnberger, “Justice and Force (A Biblical Reflection on Romans 13),” in Conflict and the Quest for Justice, eds. Klaus Nürnberger, John Tooke and William Domeris, Pietermaritzburg: Encounter, 1989, 112.
Neil Elliott, Liberating Paul: The Justice of God and the Politics of the Apostle, Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1994, 13-14.
Jean Bethke Elshtain, Just War against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World, New York: Basic Books, 2003, 51.
B. C. Lategan, “Reception: Theory and Practice in Reading Romans 13,” Text and Interpretation: New Approaches in the Criticism of the New Testament, eds. P. J. Hartin and J. H. Petzer, Leiden, the Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1991, 166.
James Moulder, “Romans 13 and Conscientious Disobedience,” Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 21, 1977, 21.
Alex Pallis, To the Romans: A Commentary, Liverpool: Liverpool Booksellers’, 1920, 141.
James Kallas, “Romans XIII. 1-7: An Interpolation,” New Testament Studies 11.4, 1965, 365-74.
C. O’Neill, Paul’s Letter to the Romans, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1975, 207-09.
Marcus Borg, “A New Context for Romans XIII,” New Testament Studies 19.2, 1973, 216.
Frank Stagg, “Rendering to Caesar What Belongs to Caesar: Christian Engagement with the World,” Journal of Church and State 18.1, 1976, 112.
Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1996, 807.
Karl Barth, The Epistle to the Romans, trans. Edwyn C. Hoskyns, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968, 484.
T. L. Carter, “The Irony of Romans 13,” Novum Testamentum 46.3, 2004, 212-13.
David M. Whitford, “The Duty to Resist Tyranny: The Magdeburg Confession and the Reframing of Romans 13,” Caritas et Reformatio: Essays onChurch and Society in Honor of Carter Lindberg, ed. David M. Whitford, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press, 2002, 92.
John R. W. Stott, “Christian Responses to Good and Evil: A study of Romans 12:9-13:10,” Perspectives on Peacemaking: Biblical Options in the Nuclear Age, ed. John A. Bernbaum, Ventura, CA: Regal Books, 1984, 51.
