ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: A Historical and Philosophical Approach

Authors

  • Davis Panadan DVK

Keywords:

Environmental Racism, Environmental Justice, Corrective Justice, Fairness and Equity, Precautionary Principles, Polluter Pays Principle, Public Trust, National Green Tribunal Act, Sustainable Development, Inter-generational Equity, Community of Environmental Justice

Abstract

The thrusts of the article are threefold: first to examine the complexities presented by environmental inequity in the context of USA and Indian environmental justice movements; and second, to explore the potential that exists within the current system in India to move environmental regulation forward in a responsible manner that makes good on a promise of a more just and fair society and, ultimately, an ecologically sustainable environment in the background of environmental justice principles; and third, in the light of discussion, to suggest a triangular conception of the community of environmental justice, with present generation, future generation and non human natural world at each of the vertices of a triangle in the background of Aristotelian framework of ‘fairness’ and ‘justice’.

Author Biography

Davis Panadan, DVK

Adv. Davis Panadan CMI, a Research student pursuing PhD in law at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, holds LLM from the same institution and a Licentiate in Oriental Canon Law from Pontifical Oriental Institute, Rome. He is author of many articles and at present he is lecturer of civil and canon law at Dharmaram Vidya Kshetram, Bengaluru.

References

Luke W. Cole and Sheila Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001, 14.

J. Bentham, Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1948, 45.

M. Bookchn, Toward an Ecological Society, Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1980, 76.

A. Dobson, ed., Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 35-40.

Wikipedia, “Environmental Justice,”<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_justice> accessed 7 May 2014.

F. M. Lynn, “Citizen Involvement in Hazardous Waste Sites: Two North Carolina Access Stories,” Environmental Impact Assessment and Review 7 (1987), 365.

Lynn, “Citizen Involvement in Hazardous Waste Sites,” 347-361.

Riley E. Dunlap and Kent D. van Liere, “The New Environmental Paradigm: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results,” Journal of Environmental Education 9 (1978), 10-19.

Michael Reisch, Routledge International Handbook of Social Justice, New York: Abingdon Oxon Press, 2014, 320.

Sheila Foster, “Environmental Justice in an Era of Devolved Collaboration,” Harvard Environmental Law Review 29 (2002), 459-498.

Duncan French, Global Justice and Sustainable Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 15-43.

“Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdulbhai,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1976, 1455; “Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1981, 344.

“Bangalore Medical Trust v. B. S. Muddappa,” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1991, 4, 54.

Upendra Baxi, “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation and the Supreme Court,” International Commission of Jurists Review 29 (1982), 37-49.

G. S. Tiwari, “Conservation of Biodiversity and Techniques of People’s Activism,” Journal of the Indian Law Institute 43 (2001), 191. See also “Sheela Barse v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1988, 2211.

“T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1997, 1228; “M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (Vehicular Pollution Case),” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1998, 8, 648.

“Francis Coralie Mullin v. The Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1981, 746.

“Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1991, 420.

“M. K. Sharma v. Bharat Electric Employees Union,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1987, 1049.

“Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1978, 597.

“Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1985, 652.

“T. Damodar Rao v. Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1987 AP 171; “L. K. Koolwal v. State of Rajasthan,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1988 Raj 2.

“M. C. Mehta v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1987, 4, 463. The Court held: “Life, public health and ecology has priority over unemployment and loss of revenue problem.”

“Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 2000, 3751. P. Leelakrishnan, “Environmental Law,” Annual Survey of Indian Law, Volume XXXVI, 2000, 252-257.

The explanation for the principle of absolute liability in “M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas case),” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1987, 965, and its subsequent application in “Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1996, 3, 212.

“M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 2000, 1997. 37Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, “Policy Statement for Abatement of Pollution,” para 3.3, February 26, 1992.

Joan Martinez-Alier, The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005, 45.

“Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1996, 2715.

“A. P. Pollution Control Board v. M. V. Nayudu,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1999, 812.

“S. Jagannath v. Union of India (Shrimp Culture case),” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1997, 811.

All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 2000, 10, 664.

“M. C. Mehta v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1997, 734. 41“State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ganesh Wood Products,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1996, 149.

“Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (CRZ Notification case),” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1996, 5, 281. The Court noted that the principle would be violated if there were a substantial adverse ecological effect caused by industry.

“Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1980, 1622.

“Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1986, 180.

“Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal (Calcutta Taj Hotel case),” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1987, 1109.

“Banawasi Seva Ashram v. State of Uttar Pradesh,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1992, 920.

“Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1986, 180.

“Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1997, 298.

“Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court, 1995, 2252 and “Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India,” All India Report, Supreme Court Cases, 1996, 5, 281.

Preamble of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/NGT-fin.pdf> Retrieved on 23-04-2014.

Article 32 and 224 of Indian Constitution.

Green Tribunal of India News, <http://awsassets.wwfindia.org/downloads/ngn_v18.html> Retrieved on 23-05-2014.

Wikipedia, “Environmental Justice,” <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_justice> 7 May 2014.

“Principles of Environmental Justice,” Proceedings, The First National People of Colour Environmental Leadership Summit xiii (October 24-27, 1992) adopted in Washington, D.C.

Tseming Yang, “Melding Civil Rights and Environmentalism: Finding Environmental Justice’s Place in Environmental Regulation,” Harvard Environmental Law Review 26 (2002), 04-08.

Robert C. Solomon, and Mark C. Murphy, eds., What Is Justice? Classic and Contemporary Readings, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 3.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, F. H. Peters, trans., London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Truaners, 1982, V.3.39.

F. M. Lynn, “Citizen Involvement in Hazardous Waste Sites: Two North Carolina Access Stories,” Environmental Impact Assessment and Review, 7, (1987), 347-361.

J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972, 3-4.

Robert Kuehn, “What’s Fairness Got to Do With It? Environmental Justice and the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses,” Cornell Law Review 67 (1993), 87.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, V.3.

Cole and Foster, From the Ground Up, Book Review, <http://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint> retrieved on 04-04-2014.

M. D. A. Freeman, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, London: Sweet and Maxwell Ltd., 2001, 523.

L. M. Gibbs, Dying from Dioxin: A Citizen’s Guide to Reclaiming Our Health and Rebuilding Democracy, Boston: South End Press, 1984, 37.

Robert D. Bullard, “Environmental Justice in the 21st Century,” Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark Atlanta University, USA, <http://ejrc.cau.edu/ejinthe21century.htm> retrieved on 04-04-2014.

Andrew Dobson, Environment and Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, 240-262.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-28

How to Cite

Panadan, D. . (2014). ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: A Historical and Philosophical Approach . Journal of Dharma, 39(2), 113–138. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/315