PRAGMATIC APPROACH OF WILLIAM JAMES AND SEON MASTER DAEHAENG TOWARDS RELIGION AND SCIENCE

Authors

  • Chae Young Kim Sogang University

Keywords:

Daehaeng, Knowledge Societies, Phenomenology of Religion, Pragmatism, Psychology of Religion, William James

Abstract

This essay draws a parallel between William James, a scientific philosopher, and Seon Master Daehaeng, a religious leader in order to establish a thought involving the science of psychology within a religious context of human experiences, to help us achieve a better understanding of the world, and move forward towards a knowledge-oriented society. A fundamental compatibility towards knowledge societies would seem to be possible if we can determine how determinations of meaning in one discipline or perspective is found not to be in conflict with the determinations that belong to another point of view. Both, in some way, exist together. Having these two points as the base of this research, I am examining the perspectives of William James and Daehaeng to form a synthesis that would help human society to move towards societies that are guided by knowledge.

Author Biography

Chae Young Kim, Sogang University

Dr Chae Young Kim is the Professor and Chair of Religious Studies in Sogang University and the President of Korean Academy of Religion. His publications include Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, Religious Education, Korean Christianity and translations of William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience into Korean and Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death into Korean.

References

Lonergan Institute, “Natural Law: Part II,” unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC: St. Anselm’s Abbey, 2019, 149.

Sunim Dahaeng, No River to Cross, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2007, 21-2

G. W. Allen, William James: A Biography, Oxford: Viking, 1967, 124.

William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985, 169-70.

David E. Leary, “New Insights into William James's Personal Crisis in the Early 1870s: Part II, John Bunyan and the Resolution & Consequences of the Crisis” in William James Studies, 2015(11), 30.

William James, The Will to Believe, New York: Dover Publications, 1956, 1-2.

William James, The Will to Believe, New York: Dover Publications, 1956, 3-4.

Daehaeng, Hanmaum Yojeon, (The Principles of Hanmaum), Anyang: Hanmaum Seon Center, 2000, 29.

Holly Andersen and Rick Grush, “A Brief History of Time Consciousness: Historical Precursors to James and Husserl” in Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47/2(2009), 277.

Donald Capps, The Religious Life: The Insights of William James, Oregon: Cascade Books, 2015, x.

William James, A Pluralistic Universe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977, 139.

Capps, The Religious Life, x; and Chae Young Kim, “William James and the Spirit of Complexity: A Pluralistic Reverie” in Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2010(50/4), 459-60.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Kim, C. Y. (2019). PRAGMATIC APPROACH OF WILLIAM JAMES AND SEON MASTER DAEHAENG TOWARDS RELIGION AND SCIENCE. Journal of Dharma, 44(3), 257–276. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/214