MORAL DEVELOPMENT IN PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
Keywords:
Moral Development, Freudian Psychology, Superego, Cognitive Developmental Theory, Moral JudgmentAbstract
Morality has been traditionally considered a philosophical and religious question, and sciences Were regarded as amoral. But today, with the increased emphasis on the human relevance of sciences in general and the great advances made in human sciences like psychology and. sociology; the role of these sciences in defining the moral dimension of human life has assumed greater importance. .Many psychologists,' in spite of their differences in presuppositions and orientations, have undertaken the study of morals using a' scientific approach. Cognitive developmental psychologists like Piaget and Kohlberg are widely known for their contributions in the area of moral development. Social learning theorists show that moral behaviour is expressed by each person as a result of imitation of other people. Prior to the acceptance of both these theories Freud stirred the moral issue by introducing the concept of conscience giving it a new meaning. , In this paper I shall indicate the approach to moral development.by these three schools and discuss their relevance to the wider question of morality.
References
Sigmund Freud, The Ego and Id (New York : W. W. Norton & Co ., 1960)1 p, I5.
Clara Thomspon, Psychoanalysis: Evolution and Development (New York: Grove Press, 1950), p. 61.
Diane E. Papalia and Sally Olds, A Child's World (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1975), p. 341.
G. Murphy, Personality (New York; Harper & Row, 1947), p, 543.
Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgement of the Child (The Free Press, 1932).
Rolf E. Muuss; "Koblberg's Cognitive-Developmental Approach-to Adolescent Morality" Adolescence, Vol. XI No. 41 Spring 1976, pp. '.41-42.
Jay M. Smith and Don-David Lusterman, The Teacher as Learning Facilitator (Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1979), p. 117.
Miller, N. E. and J. Dollard, Social Learning and Imitation (Yale University Press, 1941).
Rolf E. Muuss, The Implications of Social Learning Theory for an Understanding of Adolescent Development," Adolescence, Vol. XI, NQ. 41, Spring 1979, p. 62.
David Elkind and Irving Weiner, Development 0/ the Child (John Wiley and Sons, 1978), p. 276.
