THE PANDIT

THE EMBODIMENT OF ORAL TRADITION

Authors

  • William Cenkner The Catholic University of America

Keywords:

Pandit, Oral Tradition, Ancient Indian Education, Transmission of Scripture, Guru Tradition

Abstract

This study investigates the structure of oral tradition by defining the role of the transmitter in Hinduism, the pandit, Every scriptural tradition has its antecedent oral tradition, but some traditions place such great emphasis upon oral transmission that the scriptural canon itself takes oral form. For instance, the Druids of ancient Gaul never committed their wisdom to writing. The Celtic world, likewise, taught by a metrical and rhythmic oral transmission. Orthodox history, myth and ritual in classical Shinto were passed on orally by a hereditary priesthood of the Imperial Court. In fact, the prayers and rituals of Shinto were not set down jin writing until the 10th century A.D., even though the Japanese immediately placed Buddhist literature into written form.s In the history of Judaism there were two Torahs, one written and the other oral. The Hindu wisdom tradition has consistently valued oral transmission more than written transmission. Hindu scripture did not take written form for a millennium or longer after its canon was constituted.

References

Hajime Nakamura, Parallel Developments: A Comparative Histroy of Ideas (Tokyo: Kodansha, 1975),p, 24.

Radhakurnund Mookerji, Ancient Indian Education, Brahmanical and Buddhist (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas, 3rd edn., 1960).

A. S. Altekar, Education in Ancient India (Benares: Indian Book Shop, 1934);.

G. S. Ghurye, Preservation of Learned Tradition in India (Bombay: Popular Book Depot, 1950).

F. E. Keay, Ancient Indian Education (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1918).

Santosh Kumar Das, The Educational System of the Ancient Hindus (Calcutta: Mitra Press, 1930).

Veda Mitra, Education in Ancient India (Delhi: Arya Book Depot, 1964).

Baidyanath Saraswati, • Study of Specialists in Traditional Learning: ThePandits of Kashi,' Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society 10 (1975), 103-116.

P. V. Kane, History of Dharmasastra (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Government Oriental Series, 1930-62), Vol. 2, Part 2, 347.

Zvi Cahn, The Philosophy of Judaism (New York: Macmillan Company, 1962), 171 ff.

David R. Blumenthal, 'Where Does Jewish Studies Belong?' Journal of the American Academy of Religion 44 (1976), 536-539.

V. G. Rahurkar, The Seers of the Rgveda (Poona : Poona University, 1964).

C. Kunhan Raja, Poet-Philosophers of the Rgveda, Vedic and Pre- Vedic (Madras: Ganesh, 1963).

Richard H. Robinson, The Buddhist Religion (Encino: Dickenson Publishing Company, 1973), p. 91.

Heinrich Zimmer, Philosophy of India, edit, by Joseph Campbell (New York; Pantheon Books, 1951), p. 431.

M. Hiriyanna, ' The Training of the Vedantin,' Popular Essays in Indian Philosophy (Mysore : Kavyalaya Publishers, 1952), p. 14.

K. A. Subramania Iyer (trans.), Sphotasiddha of Mandana Misra (Poena I Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 1966), 8 ff,.

Satsvarupa dasa Gosvami, Readings in Vedic Literature (Los Angeles: The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1977), p. 4.

C. N. Mishra, The Nature and Status of Recollection (Smtti) in the Nyaya- Vaise~ika Philosophy,' Journal of the Bihar Research Society 48 (1962), 69-76.

Saul Lieberman, • The Publication of the Mishnah, ' Hellenism in Jewish Palestine (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1950), 87.

Jacob Neuser, Form and Meaning in Mishnah,' Journal of the American Academy of Religion 45 (1977), 31.

Jan Gonda, Change and Continuity in Indian Religion (The Hague; Mouton and company, 1965), p. 241.

S. K. Belvalkar and R. D. Ranade, History of Indian Philosophy, The Creative Period (Poona: Bilvakunja Publishing House, 1927), p, 441.

Joseph Rupert Geiselmann, The Meaning of Tradition (New York: Herder and Herder, 1966),pp. 94-95.

B R. Brinkman, ' On Sacramental Man: The Way of Intimacy,' The Heythrop Journal 14 (1973), 5-34.

Theodore Kisiel, The Happening of Tradition: The Hermeneutics of Gadamer and Heidegger,' Man and World 2, 3 (1969), p, 366.

William Cenkner, The Hindu Personality in Education: Tagore, Gandhi, Aurobindo (Delhi: Manohar, 1976).

Downloads

Published

1980-09-30

How to Cite

Cenkner, W. (1980). THE PANDIT: THE EMBODIMENT OF ORAL TRADITION. Journal of Dharma, 5(3), 237–251. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/1702