Media

The All-Pervasive Being / Entity of Our Time

Authors

  • Francis Arackal Nagpur University

Keywords:

Communication, Cyberspace, Media, New Media, Pervasive Media, Syntheism

Abstract

The omnipotence of mass media was already felt in the beginning of the twentieth century and media attained the status of a religion with the arrival of television. By the end of the twentieth century television, ‘the big medium’, became the surrogate parent, teacher and god and the launching of the internet enabled instant social networking. Technology is integral to media operations as Facebook, Twitter, Whatsapp, Pintrest, Instagram, etc., would be rendered ineffective without the internet. In the early 21st century the world moved beyond the ‘global village’ ending up as a ‘global living room’. No wonder Alexander Bard, the prophet who calls for triumph of the ‘netocracy’ in his latest book Syntheism – Creating God in the Internet Age, speaks of the internet as the new Holy Spirit. Indeed with the New Media a new culture, religion, sanctuary idols and priesthood are emerging.

Author Biography

Francis Arackal, Nagpur University

Dr Francis Arackal has a Master’s Degree in Philosophy from Nagpur University and Licentiate in Philosophy from St. Thomas University, Rome, PG Diploma in Media studies from Griffith College, Dublin, Ireland, and Licence and Doctorate in Social Sciences, specializing in Media, from Gregorian and St. Thomas Universities in Rome. He taught Media and Philosophy for 18 years at many Institutes and colleges. He has four books to his credit, and numerous scientific papers, articles, press reports in newspapers and periodicals both in India and abroad.

References

Pawan Agrawal, “Social Media and its Impinging Omnipresence!”

<http://www.dsalert.org/dialogue/2014/08/social-media-and-itsimpinging-omnipresence> (22 December 2014).

Kenneth D. Bailey, Methods of Social Research, New York: The Free Press, 1994, 40.

Bailey, Methods of Social Research, 41.

Jacob Srampickal, Communications Can Renew the Church, Kochi: Karunikan Books, 2009, 20.

James Watson and Anne Hill, A Dictionary of Communication and Media Studies, London: Edward Arnold, 1984, 43.

Jurgan Habermas, “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article,” New German Critique, No. 3 (Autumn 1974): 49-55.

Francis Arackal, The Indian Media: How Credible? Bombay: Pauline Publications, 2010, 99, 294-295.

Jorge Reina Schement, ed., Encyclopedia of Communication and Information, Vol. 2, 2002,568-571.

P. Bart and P. Guber, Shoot Out: Surviving Fame and (Mis) Fortune in Hollywood, London: Faber and Faber, 2003.

Lucy Küng, Strategic Management in the Media: Theory and Practice, London: Sage, 2008, 65-68.

Schement, ed., Encyclopedia of Communication and Information, Vol. 3, 2002, 811, 813.

<http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheAlternet> (09 December 2014).

Mark Piesing, “The Prophet Who Calls for Triumph of the ‘Netocracy’,” The Hindu, 9 October 2014, 12.

<http://www.pmstudio.co.uk/pmstudio/what-pervasivemedia> (08 December 2014).

<http://www.sourcewire.com/news/73628/media-andadvertisements-are-omnipresent-omnipotent-advertising-on-toilet#. VIUvVdKUfjg> (21 December 2014).

Alvin Powell, “Omnipresent Media Hurts, Helps Children,” <http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/2001/10.11/06-kidsmedia.html> (08 December 2014).

Rajesh Gupta, et al., “The Influence of Television on Urban Adolescents of Delhi,” Indian Journal of Community Medicine, JanuaryMarch 39 (1), 2014, 47-48.

<http://whatjathinkers.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/theomnipresence-of-social-media> (22 December 2014).

Stewart M. Hoover, Religion in the Media Age, London: Routledge, 2006, 9-10.

McLuhan and Fiore, The Medium is the Message, 8.

Hoover, Religion in the Media Age, 2006, 8.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-30

How to Cite

Arackal, F. (2015). Media: The All-Pervasive Being / Entity of Our Time . Journal of Dharma, 40(1), 95–110. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/161