"Conversion" in Religious Art

Authors

  • John Clark Smith University of Toronto, Canada.

Keywords:

Conversion, Religious Art

Abstract

In order to consider the place of conversion for religious art, two preliminary matters must be considered. First, the process of religious art itself, what it is and how it relates to religion and art, must be dis- cussed, and then there must follow a brief inquiry into what I mean by the word "conversion". The final section will then be prepared to consider conversion in religious art.

References

Chandogya Upanishad 6.12. 1-3. 3. Tao-teaching 21.

Samuel Laeuchli, Religion and Art in Conflict Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980), pp. 17-55.

Von Ogden Vogt, Art and Religion (Boston: Beacon, 1948),p. 18.

O. Van der Leeuw, Sacred and Profane Beauty: The Holy in Art. trans. D. Green (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963), p. 7.

E. Gilson. Painting and Reality (New York: Pantheon, 1957), pp. 288 ff.

D. Harned, Theology and the Arts (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1966), p. 19.

G. W. F. Hegel, Vorlesungen uber die Aesthe- tik , Paul Weiss, Religion and Art (Milwaukee: Marquette Univer- sity Press, 1963), p. 96.

Gilson, Painting and Reality, p. 299, F. David Martin, Art and the Religious Experience (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1972), 160-164.

R. Collinwood, The Principles of Art [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1938], pp. 335-336.

R. Hazleton, A Theological Approach to Art (Nashville: Abingdon, 1967),pp. 88-123.

Downloads

Published

1982-06-03

How to Cite

John Clark Smith. (1982). "Conversion" in Religious Art. Journal of Dharma, 7(2), 202–217. Retrieved from https://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/1538