BEYOND NATIONALISM IN THIS ‘ERA OF DISASTER’
Setting a New Relationship for a Sustainable Future
In this paper, the authors analyse the post-apocalyptic narrative as an environmental crisis discourse and suggest a vision of SDGs from the standpoint of ecological criticism. Kōbō Abe's post-apocalyptic narrative in The Ark Sakura presents ethical challenges to the readers. Furthermore, the myriad of formal elements (surreal space composition, fictional apocalyptic hypothesis, and biblical motifs) and themes (threat of nuclear war, human greed, loss of humanity, and littering problem) are converged on ecological themes to convey warning messages to humanity. This literary imagination of apocalypse and disaster plays a role as a tool for self-reflection and warning against the absurdities of reality, while at the same time presents alternatives and solutions for a new vision for the future. In particular, it demands critical reflection on collectivism, that is, nationalism founded on human selfishness. This is a strategic worldview that deals with the disasters and the destruction of people and planet, as well as a lesson to be taught by ecological writing for a new future society.
Abe, Kōbō. The Complete Works of Abe Kōbō. Vol. 21, 27, 28. Tokyo: Shinchōsha, 2000.
Abe, Kōbō. The Frontier Within. Richard F. Calichman (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
Baudrillard, Jean. “The Beaubourg-Effect: Implosion and Deterrence,” Rosalind Krauss & Annette Michelson (trans.). October Vol.20 (1982): 3-13.
Bolton, Christopher. Sublime Voices: The Fictional Science and Scientific Fiction of Abe Kōbō, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Cox, Robert. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. Los Angeles: Sage, 2010.
Doherty, Thomas J. and Clayton, Susan. “The Psychological Impacts of Global Climate Change.” American Psychologist 66.4 (2011): 265-276.
Fujii, Sadakazu. Suiso yo, roshin roshutsu no shi: Sangatsu jū ichi-nichi no tame ni, Tokyo: Otsuki Shoten, 2013.
Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005.
Greenpeace. “The Japanese government’s decision to discharge Fukushima contaminated water ignores human rights and international maritime law.”
Haga, Kōichi. “Nature's Agency in Literature: Ecocritical Experiments” KAKEN Grants
Herndl, Carl D. and Brown, Stuart C. eds. Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996.
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction, New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.
Killingsworth, M. Jimmie and Palmer, Jacqueline S. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and Environmental Politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP., 1991.
Murakami, Ryōta. “Kōbō Abe’s The Ark Sakura,” Nikkanberita,
Ōe, Kenzaburō. Imagination of the Atomic Age, Tokyo: Shinchōsensyo, 2007.
Park, Hyun-Jeong. “Ökologie und Apokalypse in der deutschen Literatur” Journal of the Humanities 41, 2013.: 209-228.
Park, Yi-jin. Phantom of Asia: Returner Kobo Abe and Postwar Japan, Sungkyunkwan University Press, 2015.
Pellow, D.N. “From More than Just Sustainability to a More Just Resilience,” Sze, J. ed., Sustainability, New York: New York University Press, 2018: 271-278.
Takahashi, Hiroko. “Who created the ‘radioactive stress myth’ and ‘rumor damage myth’?” Gendaishisō 10 (2011): 142-149
Watanabe, Hiroshi. “A fictional space outside the end times” Review of Hakobune Sakura Maru. Waseda bungaku 17.3, 1985: 102-104.
White Paper on Peace by Citizens, Tokyo: Nihonhyōronsha, 1984.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Dharma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.