ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY
Religious ecological care has emerged as an important aspect in the development of contemporary deep ecology and religious moral ethics and social care, challenging different religious traditions. Some religious thinkers try to re-examine, interpret and transform their religious traditions in order to better face the challenges of the ecological crisis. It istrue that ethics and beliefs define the way humans process, interpret, understand, and find solutions for the hard questions of existence and life. In this context, the way humans approach and search for possible solutions to the hard-to-answer questions of ecological problems gains significant pertinence. This article investigates the ecological interface Christian religion as an example and uses deep ecology and similar views to explore the Christian perspective in the context of a new relationship between human and nature. In today’s world, where human beings as a society are moving towards realizing the Sustainable Development Goals, religious ecological care takes prominence to understand the way human ethical values and beliefs affect the way we approach problems as serious as the ecological crisis, and to observe the concatenation between the People and Planet aspects of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Ayres, Jennifer R. “Cultivating the “Unquiet Heart”: Ecology, Education, and Christian Faith.” Theology Today 74.1 (2017): 57-65.
Barlow, Connie and Michael Dowd. “Ecology is the New Theology.” Religious Humanism 46.2 (2016): 69-71.
Callicott, J. Baird, and Roger T. Ames, eds. Nature in Asian traditions of Thought: Essays in environmental philosophy. New York: SUNY press, 1989.
Florio, Lucio. “The Natural Figure at Risk. Implications of the Ecological Crisis for the Theological Aesthetics.” Pensamiento 75.283 (2019): 237-250.
Francis, Pope. Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Rome: Vatican Press, 2015.
Gareiou, Zoe, and Efthimios Zervas. “Analysis of Environmental References in the Texts of the Four Gospels Using Descriptive Statistics.” Religions 9.9 (2018): 266.
Gregory, Frederick. Nature Lost? Natural Science and the German Theological Traditions of the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Haught, John F. Science and religion: From conflict to conversation. New York: Paulist Press, 1995.
Hull, Fritz. Earth & Spirit: The Spiritual Dimension of the Environmental Crisis. New York: Burns & Oates, 1993.
Keller, Catherine. “The lost fragrance: Protestantism and the nature of what matters.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 65.2 (1997): 355-370.
Keller, Catherine. “Theology, Science, and Cloud of the Impossible.” Zygon 51.3 (2016): 809-820.
Ken Gnanankan, God’s World, London: SPCM, 1999.
Knitter, Paul F. One Earth, Many Religions: Multifaith Dialogue and Global Responsibility. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1995.
Kochappilly, Paulachan. “All for Life; Life for All.” Journal of Dharma, 39.4 (2014): 335-352.
Koertner, Ulrich. “Ecological Ethics and Creation Faith.” Theological Studies 72.4 (2016): 1-9.
Leiss, William. Domination of Nature. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press, 1994.
Lohmann, Larry. “Green Orientalism.” The Ecologist 23. 6 (1993): 202–204.
McDuffie, David C. “The Epic of Evolution and a Theology of Sacramental Ecology.” Religions 10.4 (2019): 244.
Nandhikkara, Jose. “Theanthropocosmic Vision of the Holy Bible: An Alternative to the Cosmocentric and Anthropocentric Visions.” Journal of Dharma, 39.4 (2014):389-404.
Nash, Roderick Frazier. The Rights of Nature: a History of Environmental Ethics. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin press, 1989.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. An Interpretation of Christian Ethics. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2012.
Oakley, Francis. “Will and Artifice: The Impact of Voluntarist Theology on Early-Modern Science.” History of European Ideas 45.6 (2019): 767-784.
Ott, Heinrich. Das Reden vom Unsagbaren: die Frage nach Gott in unserer Zeit. Trans. Ke Lin and Yong Zhao. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Press, 1994
Peng, Xiaokang., Zicheng Liu., and Dong, Jiang. “A Review of Multiphase Energy Conversion in Wind Power Generation.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 147 (2021): 111172.
Quan, Quan., Gao, Shaoze., Shang, Yanwu., and Wang, Boxing. “Assessment of the Sustainability of Gymnocypris Eckloni Habitat Under River Damming in the Source Region of the Yellow River.” Science of The Total Environment 778 (2021): 146312.
Ray, Sugata. “Hydroaesthetics in the Little Ice Age: Theology, Artistic Cultures and Environmental Transformation in Early Modern Braj, C. 1560-1570.” South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies 40.1 (2017): 1-23.
Rockefeller, Steven C., and John Elder, eds. Spirit and Nature: Why the Environment is a Religious Issue: An Interfaith Dialogue. Boston: Beacon Press, 1992.
Scharper, Stephen Bede. Redeeming the Time. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 1997.
Schillebeeckx, Edward. The Collected Works of Edward Schillebeeckx Volume 5: The Understanding of Faith. Interpretation and Criticism. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
Schweiker, William. “The Destiny of Creation Theological Ethical Reflections on Laudato Si’.” Journal of Religious Ethics 46.3 (2018): 479-495.
Sean Mcdonagh, To Care for the Earth, London: Cassell Publishers Ltd., 1986.
Southgate, Christopher, ed. God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
Stoll, Mark. Protestantism, Capitalism, and Nature in America. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press, 1997.
Tracy, David. “Public Theology, Hope, and the Mass Media: Can the Muses Still Inspire?” God and Globalization (2000): 231-54.
Warde, Emily. “Christianity and the Environment: The Lynn White Controversy.” Ex Post Facto 20 (Spring 2011): 45-62.
White, Lynn. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science (1967): 1203-1207.
Yu, Binbin. “Urban Spatial Structure and Total-Factor Energy Efficiency in Chinese Provinces.” Ecological Indicators 126 (2021): 107662.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Dharma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.