NON-ANTHROPOCENTRIC AND DYNAMIC VISION OF HARMONY

A New Materialist Perspective

  • Ji-Yeong Yun Institute of Body and Culture, Konkuk University, South Korea
Keywords: Aristotle, Collective of Humans and Non-Humans, Latour, Plato, Ranciere

Abstract

This article deconstructs the static approach to harmony and elucidates its dynamic dimension. First, I provide critical analysis of Plato’s functionalist notion of harmony in the Republic, where harmony is viewed not as the suspension of the power relationship between the dominant and subjugated, but as the establishment of the relationship of domination that gives rise to the governability of one’s own soul and the city, and, further, contributes to the stability of the self and the system. Second, I emphasize the Aristotelian anthropocentric perspective of harmony in the Politics, where harmony is considered a fraternity of the political animal that shares the logical capacity of speech and excludes the inhuman. Third, through the lens of Latour’s new materialism, I seek to redefine harmony as a dynamic process and as material assemblages between humans and non-humans that foster creative tensions and increase the intensity of agency.

Author Biography

Ji-Yeong Yun, Institute of Body and Culture, Konkuk University, South Korea

Ji-Yeong Yun is a feminist philosopher and assistant professor at the Institute of Body and Culture, Konkuk University, South Korea. Her research fields are material feminism and French contemporary philosophy.

References

Alaimo, Stacy and Susan Hekman. “Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory.” Material Feminisms. Eds. Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008. 1-19.

Aristotle. Aristole: Œuvres majeures. Trans. J. Barthélemy Saint-Hilaire. E-art Now, 2019.

Aristotle. Aristotle’s Politics. Writing from the Complete Works. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.

Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

Bogost, Ian. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.

Bryant, Levy. Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

Callon, Michel. “Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: la domestication des coquilles St-Jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de St. Brieuc.” L’Année sociologique, numéro spécial La sociologie des sciences et des techniques 36(1986): 169-208.

De Castro, Eduardo Viveros. Métaphysiques cannibales: Lignes d’anthropologie post-structurale. Paris: PUF, 2009.

Deleuze, Gilles. Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1968.

Kohn, Eduardo. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.

Kuvavic, Ivan. “Marxisme et fonctionnalisme.” L’homme et la société 23.1(1972): 55-109.

Latour, Bruno. “On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 47.4(1996): 369-381.

Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.

Lugan, Jean-Claude. “Le systémisme structuro-fonctionnaliste de Talcott Parsons.” La systémique sociale. Ed. Jean-Claude Lugan. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009. 51-67.

Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. “Mattering: Feminism, Science and Corporeal Politics.” Mattering: Feminism, Science and Materialism. Ed. Victoria Pitts-Taylor. New York: New York University Press, 2016. 1-20.

Plato. Platon: Œuvres complètes. La république. Trans. Robert Baccou. Paris: Librairie Garnier Frères, 1950.

Plato. Plato: Complete Works. Eds. John M. Cooper and D.S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, 1997.

Plato. The Republic. Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari, translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Rancière, Jacques. Mésentes. Politique et philosophie. Paris: Galilée, 1995.

Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Trans. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

Rancière, Jacques. Le partage du sensible esthétique et politique. Paris: La Fabrique, 2000.

Witzgall, Susanne. “Power of Material/Politics of Materiality: Introduction.” Power of Material/Politics of Materiality. Eds. Susanne Witzgall and Kerstin Stakemeire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018. 13-25.

Published
2020-12-30
How to Cite
Yun, J.-Y. (2020). NON-ANTHROPOCENTRIC AND DYNAMIC VISION OF HARMONY. Journal of Dharma, 45(4), 483-498. Retrieved from http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/3421