RELIGIOUS ‘RELATIONALITY’ AS AN ETHICAL RESOURCE

  • Maheshvari Naidu University of KwaZulu Natal
Keywords: ETHICS, Religion, RELATIONALITY

Abstract

The paper probes the notion of ‘relationality’ as a possible ethical resource, having resonance in both Hindu religious thought, as well as in particular strands of feminist thinking. Drawing from an earlier ethnographic study[1] on Muslim women who follow the bodily practice of veiling, this paper situates the observations emerging from that particular ethnographic context within a discussion of religious ethics and a framework of constructed religious alterity.

 

 

Author Biography

Maheshvari Naidu, University of KwaZulu Natal

Maheshvari Naidu lectures in Anthropology in the school of Anthropology, Gender and Historical Studies at The University of KwaZulu Natal in South Africa.

References

Anne E. Kaplan, Regarding Television: Critical Approaches – An Anthology, Maryland, USA: University Publishers of America, 1983, 46.

Anne-Emmanuelle Berger, “The Newly Veiled Woman: Irigaray, Specularity, and the Islamic Veil,” Diacritics 28, 1 (1998), 93-119;

Jen’Nan Ghazal Read and John P. Bartkowski, “To Veil or Not to Veil? A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas,” Gender and Society 14, 3, (2000), 395-417.

B. D. Slife, “Modern and Postmodern Value” in Centers for the Family (2002) at www.brentdslife.com//FamilyvaluesandRelationality.pdf

Brian K. Burton and Craig P. Dunn, “Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory,” Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 2 (1996), 133-147, 135.

Carol S. Robb, “A Framework for Feminist Ethics,” The Journal of Religious Ethics 9, 1, (1981), 48-68.

Claire Colebrook, “From Radical Representations to Corporeal Becomings: The Feminist Philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz, and Gatens,” Hypatia 15, 2 (2000), 76-93.

Corinn Columpar, “The Gaze as Theoretical Touchstone: The Intersection of Film Studies, Feminist Theory, and Postcolonial Theory,” Women’s Studies Quarterly 30, 1/2 (2002), 25-44, 44.

J. Butler, Gender Trouble, London: Routledge, 1990.

J. Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, London: The Hogarth Press, 1977.

Jean Keller, “Relationality, and Feminist Ethics,” Hypatia 12, 2 (1997), 152-164.

Josie Fisher, “Social Responsibility and Ethics: Clarifying the Concepts,” Journal of Business Ethics 52, 4 (2004), 391-400.

Lucy Du Pertuis, “How People Recognize Charisma: The Case of Darshan in Radhasoami and Divine Light Mission” Sociological Analysis 47, 2 (1986), 111-124, 121.

M. Foucault, Birth of the Clinic, London: Tavistock, 1976.

M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish, Harmondsworth: Peregrine, 1979; M. Foucault, “The Eye of Power” in Power/Knowledge, C. Gordon, ed., Brighton: Harvester, 1980.

Macdonald, Myra, “Muslim Women and the Veil: Problems of image and voice in media representations” Feminist Media Studies, 6, 1, 2006, 7-23, 10.

Maheshvari Naidu, “Seeing (through) the Gaze: Marking Religious and Cultural Differences onto Muslim Female Bodies,” Journal for the Study of Religion 22, 2 (2009), 23-42.

Margaret Lock, “Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge,” Annual Review of Anthropology 1993, 133-155, 139.

Neve Gordon, “On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault,” Human Studies 25, 2 (2002), 125-145, 132.

Nick Crossley, “The Politics of the Gaze: Between Foucault and Merleau-Ponty,” Human Studies 16 (1993), 399-419.

Pippa Brush, “Metaphors of Inscription: Discipline, Plasticity and the Rhetoric of Choice,” Feminist Review 58 (1998), 22-43.

R. Neill Johnson, “Shadowed by the Gaze: Evelyn Waugh’s ‘Vile Bodies’ and ‘The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold’,” The Modern Language Review 91, 1 (1996), 9-19, 6.

Rachel Anderson Droogsma, “Redefining Hijab: American Muslim Women’s Standpoints on Veiling,” Journal of Applied Communication Research 35, 3 (2007), 294-319.

Ruth L. Smith, “Relationality and the Ordering of Differences in Feminist Ethics,” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 9, 1/2 (1993), 199-214, 202.

Sandra Harding, “Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate” in The Feminist Standpoint Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, New York and London: Routledge, 2004, 1.

Sophie Body-Gendrot, “France Upside Down over a Headscarf?” Sociology of Religion 68, 3 (2007), 289-304.

Published
2010-12-31
How to Cite
Naidu, M. (2010). RELIGIOUS ‘RELATIONALITY’ AS AN ETHICAL RESOURCE. Journal of Dharma, 35(4), 355-368. Retrieved from http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/302